Actionable Claim - Judgment Search Results

Chandrapur Zilla Sahakari Krushi and GramIn Bahuudeshiya Development B ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR2003Bom502; 2004(1)ALLMR266; 2004(3)BomCR889; 2004(1)MhLj232

..... the custody and control of all the property effects and actionable claims to which the society is entitled and the whole record ..... opportunity to be heard would obstruct the taking of prompt action especially action of a preventive or remedial nature 6 where for any ..... disease in such cases the normal presumption must be that action may be taken without hearing there are various urgent administrative .....

Pethu Reddiar Vs. Chidambara Reddiar

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1931Mad533

..... hand it is maintained that the endorsee is an assignee of the actionable claim who can sue on the debt evidenced by the note there is ..... assignment of the original obligation and applied to add that cause of action to his plaint this was allowed and hence the petition 3 ..... if the plaintiff were only seeking to amplify his original cause of action no exception could be taken to the lower court s order the .....

Gadchiroli Zilla Sahakari Krushi and GramIn Bahu-udeshiya Development ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(4)ALLMR283; 2003(5)BomCR389; 2003(2)MhLj790

..... liquidators appointed under the impugned orders the custody and control of all the property effects actionable claims books records and other documents pertaining to the business of the societies which they were ..... is to be taken if the authority is satisfied in the public interest that such action may be taken without ascertaining further details in regard to the allegations it clearly implies .....

Moosa Vs. Sub Inspector of Police

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2006CriLJ1922; 2006(1)KLT552

..... methane gas which ignited some people were killed and the rest injured the victims brought action claiming damages for injury or death against the water authority the contractors who constructed the system ..... by the accused against the police officers claiming damages for assault the questions arose as to whether issue estoppel will apply and whether the civil action is an abuse of process of .....

Mohanlal Raghunath Prasad Vs. Diwan Lachhman Singh and anr.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1960MP397

..... prosecutions are obnoxious yet english law has prescribed limits within which an actionable claim lies in a suit for malicious prosecution the plaintiff must prove three things one that the plaintiff was prosecuted ..... in english legal history it has given rise to an actionable claim for damages the gist of the action is damage because a wrong prosecution has three damaging aspects one it damages a man .....

City of St. Louis Vs. Praprotnik

Court: US Supreme Court

..... with accepted constitutional norms but page 485 u s 173 the typical retaliatory personnel action claim pits one story against another although everyone admits that the transfer and discharge of respondent ..... 1 at 236 in other words every time a municipality is held liable in tort even in a case like monell actions of its human agents are necessarily involved accordingly our task is not to draw a .....

Price Waterhouse Vs. Hopkins

Court: US Supreme Court

..... litigation while the court has properly drawn a distinction between the elements of a class action claim and an individual disparate treatment claim see cooper v federal reserve bank of richmond 467 u s 867 467 u s ..... act was the sole cause of the harm while requiring that the plaintiff in a tort suit or a title vii action prove that the defendant s breach of duty was the but for cause of .....

FranklIn Vs. Gwinnett County Public Schools

Court: US Supreme Court

..... at 241 was not limiting the traditional presumption in favor of all appropriate relief to actions claiming constitutional violations rather it was merely attempting to decide whether a litigant had a cause ..... 442 u s 228 1979 and that the bell v hood rule was limited to actions claiming constitutional violations the united states quotes language in davis to the effect that the question .....

Heck Vs. Humphrey

Court: US Supreme Court

..... must satisfy a requirement analogous to the malicious prosecution tort s favorable termination requirement cf ante at 491 thomas j concurring that would be a ..... not transpose onto 1983 elements of the malicious prosecution tort that are incompatible with the policies of 1983 and the habeas statute as relevant to claims by state prisoners the court s opinion can be read as saying nothing more than .....

Board of Ed. of Kiryas Joel Village School Dist. Vs. Grumet

Court: US Supreme Court

..... educational services shortly before the new district began operations respondents and others brought this action claiming inter alia that chapter 748 violates the establishment clause of the first amendment ..... cases which may call for different approaches some cases like these involve government actions targeted at particular individuals or groups imposing special duties or giving special benefits .....