Williams V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
Building
Tramway Company, (1878) 9 Ch D 425; Siegeberg v. Metropolitan District Railway Company, (1893) 49 LT 554; Greswolde Williams v. Newcastle-upon-Tyne Corpn., (1927) 92 JP 13; London Transport Executive v. Congregational Union of England and Wales (Inc), (1978)
Consideration
debt, without any other or fresh consideration, B. can nevertheless sue A. for the remaining 10l. See also Williams v. O'Keefe, 1910 AC 186, and a promise to pay by instalments is not sufficient consideration for extending time
Distress
remove his own chattels off the premises, and does not leave thereon sufficient to meet the arrears, Tomlinson v. Consolidated Credit Corporation, (1889) 24 QBD 135, the landlord may within thirty days take and seize such goods … or lock to find any goods distrainable. The landlord's powers are chiefly regulated by the (English) Act of William and Mary, 2 W. & M. s. 1, c. 5 (under which the power to sell was first
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Limitation of actions and prosecutions
law, might have brought an action (s. 24). But as to an action for assignment of dower, see Williams v. Thomas, (1909) 1 Ch 713. Trustees are empowered to plead statutes of limitation by the (English) Trustee Act, … land against trustees will be good against all persons claiming as cestui que trustent under their trust (see Williams v. Papworth, 1900 AC 563), but this does not apply in regard to any person affected with notice of
Abstract of title
5 QB Ex 213 though the intermediate title before the statutory or agreed commencement need not be abstracted, Williams v. Spargo, 1893 WN 100. For other instances, see L. P. Act, 1925, s. 45, and Wolstenholme and Cherry, … Properties Act, 1925 (English), s. 137 see also REGISTRATION OF TITLE TO LAND; Dart, V. & P.; and Williams, V. & P.
Corpse
temporal courts, independently of spiritual censures, on indictment or information. There is no property in a dead body, Williams v. Williams, (1882) 20 Ch D 659. Dissection.--The (English) Anatomy Act, 1832 (2 & 3 Wm. 4, c. 75),
Precatory words
of late years the tendency has been the other way; see Hill v. Hill, (1897) 1 QB 483; Williams v. Williams, (1897) 2 Ch 12; Re Oldfield, (1904) 1 Ch 549; Comiskey v. Bowring-Hanbury, 1905 AC 84.
Evidence
which is not relevant to the issues. As to when evidence of collateral facts is admissible, see Hales v. Kerr, (1908) 2 KB 601; Butterley Co. v. New Hucknall Colliery Co., (1909) 1 Ch 37. As to … 33. Is something which ascertains the truth of the fact or print in question, A Dictionary of Law, William C. Anderson, 1889, p. 419. Is of two types--oral and documentary; oral evidence refers to all statements which
Dower
a share in the land (if the dower has arisen before 1926) analogous to an undivided share, see Williams v. Thomas, (1909) 1 Ch 713; and Wolst. & Ch. Conv. Acts, 12th Edn. P. 941. The following note … of dower is not within this Act, though the Court may refuse relief on the ground of laches, Williams v. Thomas, (1909) 1 Ch 713.
Cremation
body of their testator, although the will may direct some other person to cause it to be burnt, Williams v. Williams, (1882) 20 Ch D 659. If burial in consecrated ground and cremation are both desired, cremation should
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free