Ward V Duke - Law Dictionary Search Results
Dearle v. Hall
date of notice to the trustees or other owners of the legal interest in the property assigned see ward v duncombe 1893 ac 369 the rule did not extend to equitable interests in land except to proceeds of
Bungalow
enclosing that floor either with or without gables but the space under the roof may be utilised see ward v paterson 1929 2 ch 396 restrictive covenant bungalow is a building of which the walls with the exception
Land
undivided share in land a conveyance of land does not pass tithe rent charge by implication public trustee v duke of lancaster 1927 1 kb 516 also water by a solecism is held to be a species of
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Highways
see fitzhardinge v purcell 1908 2 ch 168 or maliciously to interfere with the rights of others harrison v duke of rutland 1893 1 qb 142 where cattle or horses do damage to property adjoining a highway on
Adverse possession
amounted to denial of his title to the property claimed t anjanappa v somalingappa 2006 7 scc 570 ward v carttar 1865 lr 1 eq 29 35 deav 171 55 er 860 rains v buxton 1880 14 ch
Estate
property or ownership in and is divided into real and personal anon 1684 skin 193 countess of bridgewater v duke of bolton 1704 6 mad rep 106 barnes v patch 1803 8 ves 604 see also halsbury s
Trespasser
be a trespasser even on a highway if he is using it for an improper purpose see harrison v duke of rutland 1893 1 qb 143 and see spring guns per k ramaswamy j a rank trespasser is
Priority
427 the notice does not under the rule in dearle v hall affect the validity of the assignment ward v duncombe 1893 ac 369 it merely establishes priority under the english law of property act 1925 s 137
Declaratory decree
greatly extended by ord xxv r 5 and actions can now be brought merely to declare rights ellis v duke of bedford 1899 1 ch 515 though the jurisdiction is exercised with great caution a declaration which is
Donatio mortis causa
it is taken against and not from the executor whose assent to its enjoyment is not necessary see ward v turner 1752 2 ves sen 431 1 w tlc re wasserberg 1915 1 ch 195 re hawkins watts
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free