Skip to content

Suresh V The - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Special circumstances

nor advisable to enumerate such circumstances. Non-service of summons will undoubtedly be a special circumstance, Rajni Kumar v. Suresh Kumar Malhotra, (2003) 5 SCC 315. (Civil PC, 1908, O. 37, R. 4) In its ordinary dictionary meaning

Person

himself and not any bag, brief-case, article or container etc., being carried by him, State of Haryana v. Suresh, AIR 2007 SC 2245.

Actus curiae neminem gravabit.

SC 403: AIR 1989 SC 2073; Chinnammal v. P. Arunugham, (1990) 1 SCC 513; AIR 1990 SC 1828; Suresh Chand v. Gulam Chisti, 593: AIR 1990 SC 897; Ramji v. Ramadevi, 1990 Supp SCC. 758: AIR 1991

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Void

the position, then, as the said assessments were nullities, those are not required to be actually set aside, Suresh Chandra v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1976 Cal 110. Means null, or having no legal force or

Appeal

court asking if to set aside or revise a decision of a subordinate court, Negendra Nath Dey v. Suresh Chandra Dey, AIR 1932 PC 165: 59 IA 283. Appeal is the removal of a cause or a

At any given time

of each case in the absence of prescribed period of limitation, Ibrahimpatnam Taluk Vyasaya Cooric Sangham v. K. Suresh Reddy, (2003) 7 SCC 667 (677). [Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act 1950 (21 of

Immovable property

2 (6)] Trees are regarded as part of land because they are attached and rooted in the earth, Suresh Chand v. Kundan, (2001) 10 SCC 221 (224). Immovable property shall include land, benefits to arise out of

At any time

exercised reckoning or starting from a particular date advisedly and constantly, Ibrahimpatnam Taluk Vyavasaya Coolie Sangham v. K. Suresh Reddy, (2003) 7 SCC 667. [Andhra Pradesh (Telengana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, s. 50B(4)]

Physically handicapped

torn nose with no breathing trouble amputation of toe or finger are not within purview of physically handicapped, Suresh K. Bhat v. University of Mangalore, AIR 1987 Kant 1958: (1987) 1 LR 1987 Kant 436.

Post-graduate training

educational qualification is in a better position to imbibe the training which he received, Maheshwar Prasad Srivastava v. Suresh Singh, AIR 1976 SC 1014 (1406): (1977) 1 SCC 627. [Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945, Rules 49(c) and

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial