Smt V Krishnamma - Law Dictionary Search Results
Fraud
or tribunal. It must result in exercise of jurisdiction which otherwise would not have been exercised, Shrisht Dhawan (Smt.) v. Shaw Bros., AIR 1992 SC 1555: (1992) 1 SCC 534. Fraud is meant an intention to deceive, whether
Limited estate
the female Hindu may be legitimately traced, that which is not a full right of ownership, Gulwant Kaur (Smt) v. Mohinder Singh, AIR 1987 SC 2251 (2256): (1987) 3 SCC 674.
Dearle v. Hall
Dearle v. Hall. The rule which takes its name from this case, reported 1823, 3 Russ. 1, originated with the
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Rule 10b-5
Rule 10b-5 [10b-5 from the section of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 pursuant to which the rule was formulated] : a rule adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission in furtherance of the Securities Exchange...
v.
v. versus
Q.V.
Q.V. (quod vide), used to refer a reader to the word, chapter, etc., the name of which it immediately follows.
Stradling v. Stiles
Stradling v. Stiles. A burlesque report of an argument in banco, published in Martinus Scribelrus's works. It is, in part,
V.G
V.G., verbi gratia, for the sake of example.
judgment n.o.v.
judgment n.o.v. [Medieval Latin non obstante veredicto] judgment notwithstanding the verdict
Empire Settlement Act, 1922 (English) (12 & 13 Geo. 5, c. 13)
Empire Settlement Act, 1922 (English) (12 & 13 Geo. 5, c. 13), 'to make better provision for furthering British settlement in His Majesty's Overseas Dominions,' provides for the
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free