Skip to content

Smith V Procunier - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Volenti non fit injuria

by lord esher in yarmouth v france 1887 19 qbd at p 653 and by lord watson in smith v baker 1891 ac 355 the question is one for the jury dublin etc railway co v slattery 1878

Intoxicating liquor

corresponding excise licence duties and a deduction can be made in respect of them in income tax returns smith v lion brewery co 1911 ac 150 usher s brewery v bruce 1915 ac 433 7 new licences the

Unconditionally

unconditionally means without conditions that is conditions well known to practitioners which might have been usually imposed smith v smith 139 145 lt 23

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Labourer

v wortley 1851 21 ljmc 44 nevertheless a driver of a motor omnibus is engaged in manual labour smith v associated omnibus co 1907 1 kb 916 professional footballers are not employed by way of manual labour in

Schoolmaster

kb 160 947 as to the dismissal of a schoolmaster or mistress of a public elementary school see smith v macnally 1912 1 ch 816 meyers v humell 1912 2 ch 256 mitchell v east sussex c c

Bill of sale

s 7 the bill is void unless it be in a form scheduled to the act s 9 smith v whiteman 1909 2 kb 437 attestation by a solicitor is dispensed with and attestation by a credible witness

Deceit

cackett v keswick 1902 2 ch 456 and christine ville rubber estates 1911 28 tlr 38 and concealment smith v chadwick 1884 9 ac 187 and dery v peek 1889 14 app cas 337 under the english companies

Appropriation of payments

appropriate such a payment made before judgment after a judgment deciding that such a debt is statute barred smith v betty 1903 2 kb 317 see clayton s case

Bank-notes, or Bank-bills

a short time and others issued instead 1918 as to half notes to remit them is not payment smith v mundy 1860 29 lj qb 172 but they are payable by a bank upon indemnity redmayne v barton

Tree

trees to overhang per lord macnaghten ibid and an action lies for damage to crops by overhanging trees smith v giddy 1904 1 kb 448 by the highway act 1835 ss 64 66 no tree may be planted

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial