Smith V Paris - Law Dictionary Search Results

Volenti non fit injuria

by Lord Esher in Yarmouth v. France, (1887) 19 QBD at p. 653, and by Lord Watson in Smith v. Baker, 1891, AC (355). The question is one for the jury, Dublin, etc., Railway Co. v. Slattery, (1878)

corresponding Excise Licence duties, and a deduction can be made in respect of them in Income Tax Returns, Smith v. Lion Brewery Co., 1911 AC 150; Usher's Brewery v. Bruce, 1915 AC 433. 7. New Licences.--The powers and

Unconditionally

Unconditionally, means without conditions........ that is conditions, well-known to practitioners, which might have been usually imposed, Smith v. Smith, 139, 145 LT 23.

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Try free for 7 days See all features

Labourer

v. Wortley, (1851) 21 LJMC 44]. Nevertheless, a driver of a motor omnibus is 'engaged in manual labour', Smith v. Associated Omnibus Co., (1907) 1 KB 916. Professional footballers are not employed 'by way of manual labour' (In

Schoolmaster

KB 160 (947). As to the dismissal of a schoolmaster or mistress of a public elementary school, see Smith v. Macnally, (1912) 1 Ch 816; Meyers v. Humell, (1912) 2 Ch 256; Mitchell v. East Sussex C.C., (1914)

Bill of sale

(s. 7); the bill is void unless it be in a form scheduled to the Act (s. 9), Smith v. Whiteman, (1909) 2 KB 437; attestation by a solicitor is dispensed with, and attestation by a 'credible witness'

Deceit

Cackett v. Keswick, (1902) 2 Ch 456, and Christine Ville Rubber Estates, (1911) 28 TLR 38, and CONCEALMENT [Smith v. Chadwick, (1884) 9 AC 187, and Dery v. Peek, (1889) 14 App Cas 337]. Under the (English) Companies

Appropriation of payments

appropriate such a payment made before judgment, after a judgment deciding that such a debt is statute barred, Smith v. Betty, 1903 (2) KB 317. See CLAYTON'S CASE.

Bank-notes, or Bank-bills

after a short time and others issued instead, 1918. As to half-notes, to remit them is not payment, Smith v. Mundy, (1860) 29 LJ QB 172, but they are payable by a Bank upon indemnity, Redmayne v. Barton

Tree

trees to overhang: per Lord Macnaghten, ibid.; and an action lies for damage to crops by overhanging trees, Smith v. Giddy, (1904) 1 KB 448. By the highway Act, 1835, ss. 64-66, no tree may be planted within

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next ›
Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days