Skip to content

Shyamlal V The - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Compulsory retirement

not amount to dismissal removal and, therefore, does not attract the provisions of Article 311 of the Constitution, Shyamlal v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1954 SC 369 (375): (1955) 1 SCR 26. [Constitution of India, Art. 311]

Good Cause

Good Cause, requires a lower degree of proof as compared to 'sufficient cause', Madanlal v. Shyamlal, (2002) 1 SCC 535; Arjun Singh v. Mohindra Kumar, AIR 1964 SC 993

Purdanashin

woman who by habit or family usages, does not come out in the open to conduct her affairs, Shyamlal v. Ranbir Singh, AIR 1951 All 386: (1951) All LJ 334.

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial