Scott V Lloyd - Law Dictionary Search Results

Open Court

Open Court. Every Court of Justice is open to every subject of the King, Scott v. Scott, 1913 AC 417 (440). By statute the place where justices summarily convict is an open Court [(English)

void. Each party must go through the ceremony, consenting as a free agent without fraud or duress, see Scott v. Sebright, (1886) 12 PD 20. They must be unmarried. If a husband or wife is absent for seven

Camera

other matrimonial cause, whatever its nature, can be heard in camera unless justice cannot otherwise be administered; see Scott v. Scott, 1913 AC 417, where the whole question of hearings in camera is discussed at length by the

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Try free for 7 days See all features

Abatement

Act, 1936), and also by any private individual to whom it does a special injury, see Campbell Davys v. Lloyd, (1901) 2 Ch 518. Private nuisances may also be abated by the individuals aggrieved: see Lemmon v. Webb,

Husband and wife

Edwards v. Porter, (1923) 2 KB 538. As to form of judgment obtained against a married woman, see Scott v. Morley, (1888) 20 QBD 120. Ante-nuptial debts were provided for by ss. 13-15 (now repealed) of the Married

Judge

may be made to answer for the consequences of his acts, Anderson v. Gorrie, (1895) 1 QB 671; Scott v. Stansfield, (1868) LR 3 Ex 220. In the latter case the defendant had said to the plaintiff (an

Quiet enjoyment

ejectment by a person claiming by the lessor, but against him, See Woodfall, L. & T., and Baynes v. Lloyd, (1895) 2 QB 610; Jones v. Lavington, (1903) 1 KB 253. A covenant for quiet enjoyment is implied

ground

furnish a ground for : set on a basis [that court ed the disclosure requirement in negligence law "Scott v. Bradford, 606 P.2d 554 (1979)"] [an argument ed on erroneous assumptions]

Rescission

he was precluded by statute from taking under an open contract, or by the conditions in the contract, Scott v. Alvarez, (1895) 2 Ch 603. Under ss. 45 (11) and 49 (2) of the (English) Law of Property

Consensus, non concubitus, facit matrimonium

compotes mentis, or a boy under 14 or a girl under 12, or a person under coercion (see Scott v. Sebright, (1886) 12 PD 21), cannot enter into this, or indeed any other contract. But see now Age

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next ›
Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days