Skip to content

Same V Jones - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Partition

for a sale was not compellable to part with his share to his co-owners at a valuation, Pitt v. Jones, (1880) 5 App Cas 651. Partition was one of the matters assigned to the Chancery Division of the

False pretence, obtaining property

was held not within s. 88 of the Larceny Act, 1861 (24 & 25 Vict. c. 96), Reg. v. Jones, (1898) 1 QB 119. Although a prisoner charged with obtaining by false pretences may now be convicted though

Hereditaments

not otherwise bequeathed', go to the heir, and not as chattels to the executor or administrator. See Lloyd v. Jones, (1848) 6 CB 81 (90); Parker v. Barker, (1874) 9 Ch App 174 (190). See also Challis Law

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Wills

it will not be revoked by that marriage: Law of Property Act, 1925, s. 177, and see Sallis v. Jones, 1936, P. 43, except a will made in exercise of a power of appointment, when the estate thereby

Costs

of costs, see Ritter v. Godfrey, (1920) 2 KB 47. As to what constitutes 'good cause,' see Roberts v. Jones, (1891) 2 QB 194, and notes to abovementioned rule in Annual Practice. The general rule is that the

Not negotiable

1 KB 173; see also Imports Company Ltd. v. Westminster Bank Ltd., (1927) 2 KB 297; and R.E. Jones Ltd. v. Waring and Gillow Ltd., (1925) 2 KB 612; 1926 AC 670]. … person had from whom he took it, see Bills of Exchange Act, 1882, s. 81; G.W. Ry. Co. v. London and County Bank, 1901 AC 422. [S. 130, Negotiable Instrument Act] A warrant for interest on War

Mistake

the forged cheque of a customer cannot charge the customer with the loss), and see Jones & Co. v. aring & Gillow Ltd., 1926 AC 670; but money paid under a mistake of law is ordinarily not

Housing of the working classes

to the liability of the landlord where the tenant undertakes the repairs (fair wear and tear excepted), see Jones v. Geen, (1925) 1 KB 119. As to the necessity for notice, see Morgan v. Liverpool Corporation, (1927) … populations and needs, which are also provided for in unrepeated portions of the Acts of 1930 and 1935. Very wide powers are conferred on local authorities over the ownership of land and housing properties, and populations within

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial