Skip to content

Rex V Manchester - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Perpetuity

3 c 171 see also as to the effect of an act of parliament manchester ship canal co v manchester racecourse co 1900 2 ch 352 1901 2 ch 37 5 express exceptions set out in the english

Adultery

also husband and wife where a man finds another in the act of adultery with his wife see rex v greening 1913 3 kb 846 and kills him or her in the first transport of passion he is

Misfeasance

also the improper performance of some lawful act as to the distinction between misfeasance and nonfeasance see mcclelland v manchester corporation 1912 1 kb 118 and cases there referred to guilfoyle v port of london authority 1932 1

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Bribe

a bribe or for such an officer to conspire with others that he shall receive such a bribe rex v whitaker 1914 3 kb 1283 it has long been settled law that the secret profits of an agent

Non-feasance

for non feasance as distinguished from mis feasance see maguire v liverpool corporation 1905 1 kb 767 mcclelland v manchester corporation 1912 1 kb 118 and boyntin v ancholme drainage and nvigation commissioners 1921 2 kb 213 non

Poison

a subsequent poisoning of other persons is admissible against the prisoner reg v geering 1849 18 ljmc 215 rex v armstrong 1922 38 tlr 631 as also of antecedent poisoning reg v garner 1863 3 f f 681

Borrowing powers

the power to borrow must be strictly pursued see att gen v de winton 1906 2 ch 106 rex v locke 1910 2 kb 201 a company under the english companies act 1929 has no power to borrow

Rem, Judgment in

from saying that the status of the thing adjudicated upon was not such as declared by the adjudication rex v hartington 4 e b 780 and see castrique v imrie 8 cbns 1 405 and lr 4 hl

Autrefois acquit

r v emden 1808 9 east 437 r v king 1897 1 qb 214 explained and distinguished in rex v barron 1914 s kb 570 criminal procedure act 1851 14 15 vict c 100 s 28 and the

Communion, Holy

the authorities there referred to as to the right of the clergyman to repel from holy communion see rex v dibdin 1910 57 1912 ac 533

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial