Red Moseley V Johnson - Law Dictionary Search Results
Mistake
this condition applies whether an error complained of was discovered before or after completion of the purchase, Palmer v. Johnson, (1884) 13 QBD 351; but where the misdescription is so serious as to go to the root of
Partition
an order for partition of a wall separating the gardens of two adjoining houses, see Mayfair Property Co. v. Johnson, (1894) 1 Ch 508. By the (English) Partition Act, 1868, now repealed, it was provided (s. 3) that
Caveat viator
whether the plaintiff was a visitor or licensee. See Indermaur v. Dames, (1866) LR 1 CP 274, Latham v. Johnson, 1913 (1) KB 398, and Norman v. Great Western Railway Company, 1915 (1) KB 584 (2) CP 311.
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Allegans contraria non est audiendus
Jenk. Cent. 16.--(A person making contradictory allegations is not to be heard.) See Broom's Legal Maxims, and Buckland v. Johnson, (1854) 23 LJ CP 204, where it was held that a plaintiff having sued one of two joint
By-laws, or bye-laws
regulations, and constitutions of corporations, for the government of their members. See per Lord Russell, C.J., in Kruse v. Johnson, (1898) 2 QB 91. They are binding, unless contrary to law, or unreasonable, and against the common benefit,
Bye-law
be done or not to be alone and accompanied by some sanction or penalty for its non-observance, Kruse v. Johnson, (1898) 2 QB 91; DPP v. Hutchinson, (1990) 2 All ER 836. Means a rule or administrative provision
Red hot
Matched in: Term Red hot
Red hand
Matched in: Term Red hand
red herring
Matched in: Term red herring
Redly
In a red manner with redness
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free