Raj Mehra V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
Void
force, but frequently the word is used and construed as having the more liberal meaning of 'voidable', Pankaj Mehra v. State of Maharashtra, (2000) 2 SCC 756. Void, in relation to a juristic act, 'void' means without legal
Larceny
gain or loss and is different from 'theft' under the Indian Penal Code, K.N. Mehra v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1957 SC 369 (372). … English law contemplates permanent gain or loss and is different from 'theft' under the Indian Penal Code, K.N. Mehra v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1957 SC 369 (372).
Dishonest intention
wrongful means, of property to which the person so losing is legally entitled, K.N. Mehra v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1957 SC 369 (372): 1957 SCR 623. (Penal Code, 1860, s. 378) … to cause loss, by wrongful means, of property to which the person so losing is legally entitled, K.N. Mehra v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1957 SC 369 (372): 1957 SCR 623. (Penal Code, 1860, s. 378)
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Especially
the word 'especially' means facts that are pre-eminently or exceptionally within the knowledge of the accused, Shambhu Nath Mehra v. State of Ajmer, AIR 1956 SC 404 (406). [Evidence Act, (1 of 1872), s. 106]
Theft and larceny
offence differs from 'larceny' in English Law which contemplates permanent gain or loss, K.N. Mehra v. State of Rajasthan AIR 1957 SC 369 (372): (1957) SCR 623. (Indian Penal Code, s. 378) … in this respect the offence differs from 'larceny' in English Law which contemplates permanent gain or loss, K.N. Mehra v. State of Rajasthan AIR 1957 SC 369 (372): (1957) SCR 623. (Indian Penal Code, s. 378)
Wrongful gain, wrongful loss
gaining or a temporary 'keeping out' of property from the person legally entitled, K.N. Mehra v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1957 SC 369 (372). (Indian Penal Code, s. 378 and 23) … by the person wrongfully gaining or a temporary 'keeping out' of property from the person legally entitled, K.N. Mehra v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1957 SC 369 (372). (Indian Penal Code, s. 378 and 23)
Dearle v. Hall
Dearle v. Hall. The rule which takes its name from this case, reported 1823, 3 Russ. 1, originated with the
Rule 10b-5
Rule 10b-5 [10b-5 from the section of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 pursuant to which the rule was formulated] : a rule adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission in furtherance of the Securities Exchange...
v.
v. versus
Q.V.
Q.V. (quod vide), used to refer a reader to the word, chapter, etc., the name of which it immediately follows.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free