Skip to content

Pomeroy V Bank - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Banking

vii list 1 entry 45 in ordinary parlance banking is business transactions of a bank vimal chandra grover v bank of india 2000 5 scc 122 130 air 2000 sc 2181 banking regulation act 1949 10 of 1949

Cheque

specially to himself and the customer has no title or a defective title thereto but see underwood ltd v bank of liverpool 1924 1 kb 775 and lloyds bank ltd v savory co 1933 49 tlr 116 as

Consideration

the one party or some forebearance detriment loss or responsibility given suffered or undertaken by the other fleming v bank of new zealand 1900 ac 577 586 means everything receive in return for the supply of services or

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Estoppel

must be a representation of an existing fact and must be acted on before it is corrected vagliano v bank of england 1891 ac 107 chadwick v manning 1896 ac 231 the representation must be made by a

Joint-tenancy

stock holders relief act 1892 55 56 vict c 39 passed inconsequence of law guarantee and trust society v bank of england 1890 24 qbd 406 which provides that such stock may be transferred to and held in

Disposition of company property

if it occurs after the commencement of the winding up is avoided by s 127 hollicourt contracts ltd v bank of ireland 2001 2 wlr 290 disposition of company property where a company withdraws a sum of money

Disposition of the company's property

paying the cheque debits the cheque against the company s credit balance with the bank hollicourt contracts ltd v bank of ireland ca 2001 ch lr 555 a control for the disposition of land and an effected disposition

Under reserve

the balance of convenience clearly lies in allowing the normal banking transactions to go forward united commercial bank v bank of india air 1981 sc 1426 1440 1981 2 scc 766 1981 3 scr 300

Negligence

be compensated under this sub s must cause some loss or injury to him consumer unity trust society v bank of baroda 1995 2 scc 150 153 ii negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable

House of Commons

customs and excise and to income tax the act was passed in consequence of the decision in bowles v bank of england 1913 1 ch 57 the house of commons acting collectively in a matter falling within the

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial