Skip to content

Ors V Chaudhary - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Compromise

between the parties means that there is some element of give and take on both sides, Ram Lakhan Chaudhary v. Haridwar Chaudhary, 2005 (12) SCC 383 [Civil Procedure Code, 1908, O. 23, r. 3] Is always bilateral … ending of their controversy to arbitrators. As to the authority of counsel to compromise an action, see Neale v. Gordon-Lennox, 1902 AC 465; and of solicitor, see Fray v. Voules, (1859) 1 E&E 839; and Macaulay v.

Senior counsel

akin to a Queen's counsel in England next after the Attorney General and the Solicitor General, T.V. Chaudhary v. Chief Secretary, Govt. of A.P. (1987) 3 SCC 258: (1987) 3 SCR 258.

Judicial office

as an excuse good enough to elevate the administrator into a holder of judicial office, State of Haryana v. Haryana Co-operative Transport, AIR 1977 SC 237 (239): (1977) 1 SCC 271. 'Judicial office' is used in the … of the Judicial Service, or, in short, a judicial officer. In the matter of enrolment of Sri H.P. Chaudhari, AIR 1959 All 472. 'Judicial office' subsisting office with a substantive position which has an existence independent from

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Lawful guardian

ward is established by means which are lawful and legitimate that relationship is intended to be included, State v. Ramji Vithal Chaudhari, AIR 1958 Bom 381 (384). The words 'lawful guardian' in this section include any person … by means which are lawful and legitimate that relationship is intended to be included, State v. Ramji Vithal Chaudhari, AIR 1958 Bom 381 (384). The words 'lawful guardian' in this section include any person lawfully entrusted with

Panjis

relationship and caste turn on them. Statements about pedigree are not therefore lightly made in such cases, Sitaji v. Bijendra Narain Chaudhary, AIR 1954 SC 601 (603). (Evidence Act, 1872, ss. 32, 33)

Science

typewriter expert as an opinion evidence coming within the ambit of s. 45 of the Evidence Act, State v. S.J. Chaudhary, AIR 1996 SC 1491 (1496). [Evidence Act, 1872, s. 45]

Year of allotment

break or reversion, a Senior post otherwise than as a purely temporary or local arrangement, Anil Kumar Chaudhary v. State of Assam, AIR 1975 SC 1061: (1975) 4 SCC 7: (1975) 3 SCR 875.

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial