Of Thomas V Thomas - Law Dictionary Search Results
Apportionment
in respect of time accordingly (s. 1). This Act has been held in and since Swansea Bank v. Thomas, (1879) 4 Ex D 94, to apply not only, as the former Acts did, between two classes of
Court of record
record is undoubtedly a superior court which is itself competent to determine the scope of its jurisdiction, M.M. Thomas v. State of Kerala, (2000) 1 SCC 666. In relation to any matter, means the court to which proceedings … orders passed by it the High Court has not only power, but a duty to correct it, M.M. Thomas v. State of Kerala, (2000) 1 SCC 666 (672): AIR 2000 SC 540. [Constitution of India, Art. 215]. See
Due process of law
of India, Art. 21] It embraces the fundamental concept of a fair trial, with opportunity to be heard, Thomas v. Baptiste (PC), (1999) 3 WLR 249. Is a concept adopted by the American Constitution the process of law … the state whereby the individual obtains the opportunity of achieving a commutation by executive act under domestic law, Thomas v. Baptiste (PC), (2000) 2 AC LR 1.
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Dower
in the land (if the dower has arisen before 1926) analogous to an undivided share, see Williams v. Thomas, (1909) 1 Ch 713; and Wolst. & Ch. Conv. Acts, 12th Edn. P. 941. The following note has
Neutral
means, 'indifferent, unbiased, impartial, not engaged on either side'. Conceptually it is not aligning with either view, Lily Thomas v. Speaker, Lok Sabha, (1993) 4 SCC 234. --means, 'indifferent, unbiased, impartial, not engaged on either side'. Conceptually it … --means, 'indifferent, unbiased, impartial, not engaged on either side'. Conceptually it is not aligning with either view, Lily Thomas v. Speaker Lok Sabha, (1993) 4 SCC 234 (237). [s. 30(1)(e), Companies Act]
Idem sonans
CASES RESERVED); and see also Wells v. Cooper, (1874) 30 LT 721, where in an action of trespass Thomas Cox, a special juror, served by mistake for Thomas Fox on a common jury. And see MISNOMER.
Proceeding
Maharaja Pratap Singh, AIR 1957 Pat 102. Proceeding, shall include the proceedings at the appellate stage, Mathew M. Thomas v. I.T. Commissioner, AIR 1999 SC 999. Proceeding, the word 'proceeding' which appears in s. 13A (a). and (b)
Costs
the position is as between subject and subject. See R. v. Archbishop of Canterbury, (1902) 2 KB 571; Thomas v. Pritchard, (1903) 1 KB 212; Johnson v. King,1904 AC 824; Rwland v. Air Council, 1923 WN 72; Re
Limitation of actions and prosecutions
have brought an action (s. 24). But as to an action for assignment of dower, see Williams v. Thomas, (1909) 1 Ch 713. Trustees are empowered to plead statutes of limitation by the (English) Trustee Act, 1888,
Hospitals
land tax, see s. 25 of the Land Tax Act, 1797 (38 Geo. 3, c. 5), and St. Thomas', etc., Hospitals v. Hudgell, (1901) 1 KB 364; and from property tax, see Income Tax Act, 1918, and
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free