Of Ram Kumar V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
Good faith
be deemed to be done in good faith which is not done with due care and attention, Munshi Ram v. Narsi Ram, AIR 1983 SC 271 (274): (1983) 2 SCC 8: (1983) 2 SCR 233. In order … question of good faith in prosecuting the suit as provided in s. 14 of the Limitation Act, Vijay Kumar Rampal v. Diwan Devi, AIR 1985 SC 1669 (1670). [Limitation Act, (36 of 1963), s. 14] Good faith
Cognizance
police report, prima facie he does so of the offence or offence disclosed in such report, Darshan Singh Ram Kishan v. State of Maharashtra, (1972) 1 SCR 571: (1971) 2 SCC 654: AIR 1971SC 2372. According to … 'the exercise jurisdiction' or 'power to try and determine to causes'. In common sense taking notice of, Rakesh Kumar Mishra v. State of Bihar, (2006) 1 SCC 557. Means 'jurisdiction' or the exercise or jurisdiction or power
Cause of action
is maintainable for ejectment, because the fresh trespass creates a fresh cause of action, Ajit Chopra v. Sadhu Ram, (2000) 1 SCC 114. Every fact which it is necessary to establish to support a right or obtain, … fact which it is necessary to establish to support a right to obtain a judgment, Prem Chand Vijay Kumar v. Yashpal Singh, (2005) 4 SCC 417. Is a bundle of facts which are required to proof for obtaining
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Law
made by the State, that is to say, by the Union Parliament or the Legislatives of the States, Ram Chandra Prasad v. State of Bihar, AIR 1961 SC 1629: (1962) 2 SCR 50. It includes industrial law … his command which has to be obeyed by the citizens whether they agree with it or not, Raj Kumar Nursing Pratap Singh Deo v. State of Orissa, AIR 1964 SC 1793 (1797). It includes any Ordinance, order
Trial
Trial, is used in the sense of reference to a stage after the inquiry, State of Bihar v. Ram Naresh Pandey, AIR 1957 SC 589: 1957 SCC 282: 1957 SCR 279: 1957 SCJ 386: 1957 SCA 350: … stage of the proceeding in a criminal case after the charge had been framed against the accused, Vijay Kumar v. State, 1977 CLR J&K 37 (41): 1977 FAJ 526. Trial, is used in the sense of reference to
True copy
copy, Shipra v. Shanti Lal Khailval, (1996) 5 SCC 181: AIR 1996 SC 1691 (1693); Murarka Radhey Shyam Ram Kumar v. Roop Singh Rathore, AIR 1964 SC 1545: (1964) 3 SCR 573: 1965 (1) SCJ 153. [Representation of the
Actus curiae neminem gravabit.
1987 SC 2195, Nand Kishore Morwah v. Samundri Devi, (1987) 4 SCC 382: AIR 1987 SC 2284, Atama Ram Mital v. Ishwar Singh, (1988) 4 SCC 284: AIR 1988 SC 2031; Mithilesh Kumari v. Prem Behari Khare, … (para 16); See Also CIT v. B. N. Bhattacharjee, (1979) 4 SCC 121: AIR 1979 SC 1725; Raj Kumar Dey v. Taropado Dey, (1987) 4 SCC 398; AIR 1987 SC 2195, Nand Kishore Morwah v. Samundri Devi,
Jurisdiction
the act impugned, but generally the authority of the Judicial Officer to act in the matter, Tayen v. Ram Lal, ILR 12 All 115 relied; Anowar Hussain v. Ajay Kumar Mukherjee, AIR 1965 SC 1651 (1654): (1965)
Establishment
they would also be establishments within the meaning of that expression as used in the amended Entry 27, Ram Kumar Misra v. State of Bihar, AIR 1984 SC 537 (539): (1984) 2 SCC 451. [Bihar Shops and Establishments
Copy
that the copy shall be so true that nobody can by any possibility misunderstand it, Murarka Redhey Shyam Ram Kumar v. Roop Singh Rathore, AIR 1964 SC 1545 (1550). [Representation of the People Act (43 of 1951), s. 81(3)]
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free