Nath - Law Dictionary Search Results
Public policy, opposed to public policy
interest declare such practice to be opposed to public policy, Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. v. Brojo Nath Ganguly, AIR 1986SC 1571 (1612): (1986) 3 SCC 156: (1986) 2 SCR 278.
Prospectus
in a company and sets forth the advantages of the company an advertisement is also a prospectus, Paramatha Nath v. Kali Kumar, AIR 1925 Cal 714: (1925) ILR 51 Cal 440. Prospectus, is defined by s. 380
Parting with possession
means giving possession to persons other than those to whom possession had been given by the lease, Jagan Nath v. Chander Bhan, AIR 1988 SC 1362 (1364): (1988) 3 SCC 57: (1988) Supp 1 SCR 325. [Delhi
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Probation
Probation, connotes a period of trial, Ajudhia Nath Dhingra v. Union of India, 1976 Sim LJ 357. Means a sort of 'locus pententiae' to the employer
Presume
or proved by direct testimony) as to the truth of a fact alleged, State of Maharashtra v. Som Nath Thapa, AIR 1996 SC 1744 (1750): (1996) 4 SCC 659.
Retrospective
14 and 16 of the Constitution in respect of acts done before the Constitution came into force, Rabindra Nath Bose v. Union of India, AIR 1970 SC 470: (1970) 1 SCC 84: (1970) 2 SCR 697. Retrospective,
Other person liable to pay
the liability cannot therefore be construed with reference to the Partnership Act or any other statute, Sahu Rajeshwar Nath v. ITO, AIR 1969 SC 667 (669): (1969) 1 SCR 999. (Income Tax Act, 1922, s. 29)
Ordinarily
any reflection of other statutory provision due to absence of such. Its meaning would be a directory, Tarak Nath Mistri v. University of Calcutta, AIR 2007 (NOC) 1705 (Cal).
On the date fixed for scrutiny
place'. In other words, the qualification must exist from the earliest moment of the day of scrutiny, Pashupati Nath Singh v. Harihar Prasad Singh, AIR 1968 SC 1064 (1967): (1968) 2 SCR 812. [Representation of the People
Regularly kept in the course of business
should be held to have been regularly kept. The system need not be elaborate, Balmukand &Anr. v. Jagan Nath, AIR 1963 Raj 212. The words 'regularly kept' are not synonymous with 'correctly kept', Parasram Kalyandas v. Champalal
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free