N M V Vellayappa - Law Dictionary Search Results
Interlocutory order
between the commencement of an action and the entry of the judgment, V.C. Shukla v. C.B.I., AIR 1980 SC 962 (976). (Order XXXIX, Rule 6, … Interlocutory order, it has to be construed in con-tradiction to or in contrast with final order. It means not a final order, but an intermediate order. It is made between the commencement of an action and the … Interlocutory order, it has to be construed in con-tradiction to or in contrast with final order. It means not a final order, but an intermediate order. It is made between the commencement of an action and
judgment
judgment also judge·ment [jəj-mənt] n 1 a : a formal decision or determination on a matter or case by a court ;esp : … case by a court ;esp : final judgment in this entry compare dictum, disposition, finding, holding, opinion, ruling, verdict NOTE: Under Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure judgment encompasses a decree and any order
Making of the order
such person in order to be complete and effective, Nripendra N. Majumdar v. N.M. Bardhan, AIR 1959 Cal 219 (221). (Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951) … order, an order may be taken to be made on the date it came into existence, if the nature of the order is such that it is not necessary to communicate it to anyone. If an order … Making of the order, an order may be taken to be made on the date it came into existence,
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Or any other process
process akin to stentering/tentering would fall within the meaning of the proviso and, consequently the benefit of the notification cannot be availed by the respondent, C.V. Rajendran v. N.M. Muhammed Kunhi, (2002) 7 SCC 444. The amplitude
Reservation
Reservation of the Sacrament is an offence punishable by deprivation, Oxrofd (Bishop) v. Henly, 1909 P. 319. As to a reservation in a conveyance and … to a reservation in a conveyance and how it differs from an exception, see title EXCEPTION. Reservation is not a constitutional compulsion but is discretionary according to the ruling of this Court in Rajendran's case. State of … something different from the 'selection' of permissible area. The two terms were not only not synonymous but were mutually exclusive. 'Selection' of permissible area was allowed only to a landlord who had not exercised his right of
Public servant
doing so as a Minister and in execution and discharge of his duty as such public servant, Dattatraya Narayan Patil v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1975 SC 1685: (1976) 1 SCC 11: (1975) Supp SCR 145. (iii) … Public servant, has the same meaning as in s. 21 of the Indian Penal Code. [Arms Act, 1959 (54 of 1959), s. 2(1)(j)] Public
Scheduled castes and scheduled tribes
in the country. This is the result of historical cause, T. Devadasan v. Union of India, AIR 1964 SC 179: (1964) 4 SCR 680. (ii) … Union of India, AIR 1964 SC 179: (1964) 4 SCR 680. (ii) Scheduled castes and scheduled tribes are not a caste within the ordinary meaning of caste. Scheduled Castes and tribes are descriptive of backwardness. It is … Scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, it is an accepted fact that members of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes are by the large backward in comparison with other communities in the
Discrimination with reasons
classes are a rational classification recognised by our Constitution, State of Kerala v. N.M. Thomas, (1976) 2 SCC 310: AIR 1976 SC 490: (1976) 1 … Discrimination with reasons, means rational classification for differential treatment having nexus to the constitutionally permissible object. Preferential representation for the backward classes in services with due regard to administrative … Discrimination with reasons, means rational classification for differential treatment having nexus to the constitutionally permissible object. Preferential representation for the backward classes
Equal justice
the salvation of the very weak and down-trodden, and the methodology for levelling, them up to a real, not formal equality, being the accent, State of Kerala v. N.M. Thomas, (1976) 2 SCC 310: AIR 1976 SC
Equal opportunity
of positive State action. To help the lagging social segments by special care, is a step towards and not against a larger and stabler equality, State of Kerala v. N.M. Thomas, (1976) 2 SCC 310: AIR 1976
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free