Mohammad V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
Marz-ool-maut
v. Rabiabai, 30 Bom 537; Mohammad Mashud Hasan Khan v. Mohammad Anwar Husain Kehan, 6 ALJ 503; Sheikh Mohammad v. Khudija Bibi, 12 ALJ 132. Marz-ul-maut, a gift. For a gift to be declared invalid owing to its
Lease
in land--a contingent agreement was not a lease within cl. (d) of section 17(1), Mangan Lal Deoshi v. Mohammad Moinul Haque, AIR 1951 SC 11: (1950) SCR 833. Means a lease as defined in s. 105 of
Warranty
on evidence to have been intended by the parties to enter the bargain, Dudhia Forest Co-operative Society v. Mohammad Saiyad S. Abdul Rahman's Co., (1980) 21 Guj LR 272.
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Railway
1963 Ori 20. 'Railway' includes 'steamer' but a jetty with but a steamer is not part of steamer, Mohammad Khaliluddin v. Union of India, AIR 1962 Pat 109 (112). [Railways Act, 1890, s. 3(4)]
Same transaction
154; Debi Prasad v. Emperor, 212 IC 135: Raj Kishore Tewari v. Rex, AIR 1949 All 139; Faiz Mohammad v. Emperor, (1945) ILR 1945 Ker 100. Same transaction, suggests a continuity of action and purpose. It has been
Take
hands or into one's possession, Power or Control by force or, Stratagem, to Seize or Capture Physically, Saidu Mohammad v. Food Inspector, 1973 Ker LJ 681: 1973 Mad LJ Cr 582: 1973 Ker LT 678. Mean 'order proceeding'
Abduction
would be complete if the abduction was completed with the said objective, State of West Bengal v. Mir Mohammad Omar, (2000) 8 SCC 382. Is the act of leading someone away by force or fraudulent persuasion, Black
Consent
391. The term 'consent' is a much stronger word than knowledge because it implies conscious assent, Haji C.H. Mohammad Koya v. T.K.S. M.A. Muthukoya, (1979) 2 SCC 8: AIR 1979 SC 154 (168): (1979) 1 SCR 664.
Sentence
convict of the fact thus ascertained. Any consequence which flows after conviction can be looked upon as sentence, Mohammad Shabir Maulamaiya v. State of Maharashtra, (1977) Mah LJ 338. Means the judgment that a court formally pronoun-ces
Pardanashin lady
deed was not only executed by, but was explained to and really understood byher, Bhikary Ram v. Hedait Mohammad Sahaji, AIR 1985 Ori 62. A lady in a veil, normally worn by Muslim ladies as a customary
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free