Did you mean: may v commissioner?
Mays V Commissioner - Law Dictionary Search Results
Property
context might require, it signifies every possible interest which a person can acquire, hold and enjoy, J.K. Trust v. Commissioner of Income Tax, AIR 1957 SC 846 (849): (1958) SCR 65. [Income Tax Act, 1922, s. 4(3)(i)] (vi)
Income
loss policies, were income within the meaning of s. 2(6c) of the Income Tax Act, Raghuvanshi Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, AIR 1953 SC 4: (1953) SCR 177. Income connotes a periodical monetary return 'coming in'
Information
state of the law and so would cover information as to relevant judicial decisions, Maharaj Kumar Kamal Singh v. Commissioner of Income Tax, AIR 1959 SC 257: (1959) Supp 1 SCR 10. [Income Tax Act, 1922, s. 34]
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Person
Person, a Hindu Undivided Family is a person, Kshetra Mohan-Sannyasi Charan Sadhukhan v. Commissioner of Excess Profit Tax, West Bengal, AIR 1953 SC 516. According to company law it does not mean
Goodwill
is run and what the competition is, contribute also to the goodwill. S.C. Cambatta and Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax, AIR 1961 SC 1010 (1012): (1961) 2 SCR 805. Goodwill denotes the benefit arising
Business
meaning. Its perceptions differ from private to public sector or from institutional financing to commercial banking, Mahesh Chandra v. Regional Manager Uttar Pradesh Financial Corpn., AIR 1993 SC 935 (939): (1993) 2 SCC 279. [State Financial Corporation … would undoubtedly be property, unless there is something to the contrary in the enactment, J.K. Trust Bombay v. CIT, (1958) SCR 65: 1957 SCJ 845: AIR 1957 SC 846. Business includes the activities carried on by any
Manufacture
transformation, a new and different article must emerge having a distinctive name, character or use, Hindustan Poles Corporation v. Commissioner of Central Excise, (2006) 4 SCC 85: (2006) 4 JT 185: (2006) 3 SCALE 601: (2006) 4 SLT
Adequate consideration
consideration would not apply to a gift, as a gift is a transfer without consideration, Kumari Sonia Bhatia v. State of U.P., AIR 1981 SC 1274: (1981) 2 SCC 585. [Contract Act, 1872, s. 2(b) (9 of … be accepted. A reference to the decision of Hidayatullah, J. as he then was in Tulsidas Kilachand v. CIT shows that the words 'adequate consideration' were held to denote consideration other than mere love and affection which,
Consideration
equivalent or return given or suffered by one for the act or promise of another, Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Shiv Kumar Joshi, (2000) 1 SCC 98. A valuable consideration in the sense of the law may … inconvenience sustained or suffered by the promisee at the request, express or implied, of the promisor. See Laythoarp v. Bryant, 3 Scott 250; 2 Wms. Saund 137 h; Currie v. Misa, (1875) LR 10 Exch 153. Consideration
Salami
it may properly be held to be a payment on capital account, Maharaja Chintamani Saran Nath Sah Deo v. CIT, AIR 1972 SC 80 (81): (1971) 2 SCC 521: (1972) 1 SCR 36. 'Salami' is defined as; … may properly be held to be a payment on capital account, Maharaja Chintamani Saran Nath Sah Deo v. CIT, AIR 1972 SC 80 (81): (1971) 2 SCC 521: (1972) 1 SCR 36. 'Salami' is defined as; 'a
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free