Mahals - Law Dictionary Search Results
Mahal
Mahal [Indian, literally a place], any land or public fund producing a revenue to the government of Hindostan. Mahalaat
Zamindari
Zamindari, has a well-established connotation. It means a person who is the owner, or a co-sharer, of a mahal and as such, has an interest in the common land of the mahal and the management of the
Malik-makbuza
Malik-makbuza, any person owning one or more plots of lands separately assessed with revenue in a mahal and who is not a malguzar, inferior proprietor or member of the proprietary body of the mahal, Khurshed
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Modesty
of shame proceeding from instinctive aversion to impure or coarse suggestions, Oxford English Dictionary (1993 Edn.); Raju Pandurang Mahale v. State of Maharashtra, (2004) 4 SCC 371. Modesty, as freedom from coarseness, indelicacy or indecency; a regard
Zamindar
or a co-sharer of a mohal and as such has an interest in the common land of the mahal and the management of the mahal, has the right to realise rent from tenants and in the absence
Building
Rao Gujar, AIR 1966 SC 991 (994): 1963 (1) SCR 428. [Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950 (1 of 1951), s. 5(a)] The expression 'building' according to the definition given in
Growing crop
of Bombay, AIR 1959 SC 735 (740): (1959) Supp 2 SCR 339. [M.P. Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals and Alienated Lands) Act, (1 of 1951), s. 34] Crops that are in process of growth, Black's Law
Includes
and import but also those things which the interpretation clause declares that they shall include, CIT v. Taj Mahal, AIR 1972 SC 168 (170): (1972) 3 SCC 550.
Plant
fixed or movable, live or dead, which he keeps for permanent employment in his business, C.I.T. v. Taj Mahal Hotel, (1971) 3 SCC 550: (1971) 82 ITR 44; Scientific Engineering House (P) Ltd. v. C.I.T., (1986) 1
Popular sense
people conversant with the subject-matter with which the statute is dealing, would attribute to it', CIT v. Taj Mahal Hotel, AIR 1972 SC 168 (170): (1971) 3 SCC 550.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free