Ltd V Special - Law Dictionary Search Results
Goods
purposes need not alter their status as 'goods' because the Code definition includes 'specially manufactured goods', Advent Systems Ltd. v. Unisys Corpn., 925 F. 2d 670 3d Cir 1991. Associated Cement Companies Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, AIR … Act, 1985, Ch. 53, Central Excise Act, 1944, ss. 3 and 5A, Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957, s. 3; Customs Act, 1962, s. 25]; Commissioner of Central Excise, Allahabad v. Ginni Filaments
Rate
not directly related to taxable income, it maybe called tax computed at a certain rate, Sundaram Co. (Private) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, AIR 1968 SC 124: (1967) 3 SCR 798. A Municipality cannot impose a tax, but … by the respective authorities having power to raise money by a public rate, the only exception being a special rate in rural districts for lighting under the (English) Lighting and Watching Act, 1833 (3 & 4 Will.
Company
a creature of statute. Its birth, progress, and extinction are all controlled by the statute, Neptune Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Union of India, (1973) 1 SCC 310: AIR 1973 SC 602: (1973) 2 SCR 940. Company is defined … either (1) in a charter, as the Bank of England and many insurance companies; or (2) in a special Act of Parliament, with which, as authorizing an undertaking of a public nature such as a railway, the
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Suit
any particular statute will have to made in the content in which the same is used, Madalsa International Ltd. v. Central Bank of India, AIR 1998 Bom 247. Suit, does not become necessarily a suit for accounts merely
Compensatory tax
tax by a meticulous test, and in the nature of things that cannot be done, Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1962 SC 1406 (1425). (Constitution of India, Art. 301) Means taxes which would otherwise … of Haryana, (2006) 7 SCC 241. Compensatory tax, is a compulsory contribution levied broadly in proportion to the special benefits derived to defray the costs of regulation or to meet the outlay incurred for some special advantage
Cess
and Co. v. State of Mysore, (1967) 1 SCR 548: AIR 1967 SC 1512. Also see, India Cement Ltd. v. State of T.N., (1990) 1 SCC 12: AIR 1990 SC 85. It means a tax and is generally … replaced it in England. It means a tax and is generally used when the levy is for some special administrative expense what the name (health cess, education cess, road cess etc.) indicates. When levied as an increment
Prior or previous
be implied if the contextual situation or the object and design of the legislation demands it, Graphite India Ltd. v. Durgapur Projects Ltd., (1999) 7 SCC 645. The word 'prior' or 'previous' may be implied if the contextual … 'permission' is qualified by the word 'previous' and in ss. 8(1), 8(2) and 31, the expression 'general or special permission' is qualified by the word 'previous', whereas in s.s 13(2), 19(1), 19(4), 20, 21(3), 24, 25, 28(1)
Public authority
share-holders from its operations as an infrastructure company, (iii) that there was no obligation on the Railtrack Infrastructure Ltd. to conduct its operations in a manner subservient to the public interest, (iv) that the Railtrack is not … subject to government influence or control, (vi) that the defendant possessed no special powers nor did it enjoy immunities which might have been indications of … transactions for the benefit of the public and not for private profit, Halsbury's Laws of England, 3rd Edn., Vol. 30, p. 682. Means any authority or body established or con-stituted,-- (i) by or under the Constitution; (ii)
Motor vehicle
special type adapted for use only in a factory or in any other enclosed premises', Automotive Manuacturers (P) Ltd. v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1972 SC 229: (1972) 2 SCR 593: (1972) 1 SCC 125. The word
Cheque
or specially to himself and the customer has no title or a defective title thereto.' But see Underwood, Ltd. v. Bank of Liverpool, 1924 (1) KB 775; and Lloyds Bank, Ltd. v. Savory & Co., (1933) 49 TLR … 'in good faith and without negligence he receives payment for a customer of a cheque crossed generally or specially to himself and the customer has no title or a defective title thereto.' But see Underwood, Ltd. v.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free