Ltd V Ito - Law Dictionary Search Results
Has reason to believe
formation of the belief and are not extraneous or irrelevant to the purpose of the section, M.P. Industries Ltd. v. ITO, (1970) 2 SCC 32 (37): AIR 1970 SC 1011. (Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, s. 34)
Capital assets
not include lands from which the income derived is agricultural income, First ITO, Salem v. Short Brothers (p.) Ltd., (1966) 3 SCR 84: AIR 1967 SC 81 (85). [Income Tax Act (10 of 1922)]
Business
to, such trade, commerce, manufacture adventure or concern ....... [Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954, s. 2(cc)], Gopal Industries Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1971 SC 2054 (2057): (1971) 2 SCC 532. The expression 'business', as observed by … no warrant for giving a restricted meaning to it excluding 'professional connections' from its scope, Barendra Prasad Ray v. ITO, (1981) 3 SCR 387: (1981) 2 SCC 693: AIR 1981 SC 1047 (1054). [Income Tax Act, 1961 (43
Keep your definitions linked to case research
State
only exercises limited contract which is purely regulatory and not pervasive. Board is therefore not state, Zee Telefilms Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR 2005 SC 2677. In Article 3 of Constitution of India as amended by the … context of Art. 246. There, the expression 'State' means the States specified in the First Schedule, T.M. Kanniyan v. ITO, AIR 1968 SC 637: (1968) 2 SCR 103. [General Clauses Act, 1897, s. 3(58)] The expression 'State' has
Direction
to obey or carry out implicitly only the instruction, Municipal Corpn. of Greater Bombay v. Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd., (2002) 4 SCC 219 (227). [Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1988 (3 of 1988)] … which the appellate or revisional authority, as the case may be, is empowered to give under the section, ITO v. Murlidhar Bhagwandas, AIR 1965 SC 342: (1964) 6 SCR 411. It must be an express direction necessary
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
Try the research workspace - 7 days free