Kennedy V Strong - Law Dictionary Search Results
separate maintenance
spouse to another during separation [entitlement to separate maintenance does not extend to the division of marital assets "Kennedy v. Kennedy, 662 So. 2d 179 (1995)"]
Necessaries
the same meaning as has been attached to it in other connections, e.g., in cases of infants' contracts, Kennedy v. Horden Collieries Ltd., (1925) 2 KB 438. It does not, however, include savings, Welsh Navigation Steam Coal Co.
Barrister, or Barrastor
to counsel for his advocacy is not binding, see Re Le Brasseur & Oakley, (1896) 2 Ch 487; Kennedy v. Broun, (1863) 13 CBN S 677, where the whole law on the subject of counsel's fees is elaborately
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Agency and agent
principal and third parties. Halsbury's Laws of England, Vol. 1(2), 4th Edn., Para 1, p. 4. See also Kennedy v. De Trafford, (1897) AC 180; International Harvestor Co. of Australia Pvt. Ltd. v. Carrigane Hazeldene Pastoral Co., (1958)
Pretensed right
Act, 1897 (now repealed)), it had to be shown that the buyer knew the title to be bad, Kennedy v. Lyell, (1885) 15 QBD 491.
Si as pro auro veneat non valet
is sold for gold it is invalid. The maxim was discussed by the Divisional Court of Q.B. in Kennedy v. Panama & Mail Co., 1867 LR 2 QB 580 (588
strong mark
Matched in: Term strong mark
Dearle v. Hall
Dearle v. Hall. The rule which takes its name from this case, reported 1823, 3 Russ. 1, originated with the
Rule 10b-5
Rule 10b-5 [10b-5 from the section of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 pursuant to which the rule was formulated] : a rule adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission in furtherance of the Securities Exchange...
v.
v. versus
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free