Did you mean: jones v more?
Jones V Moore - Law Dictionary Search Results
Landlord and tenant
to fitness and repair in the case of small houses under the housing acts see that title and jones v phillips and green 1925 1 kb 659 as to the difference between the landlord s liability to repair
Slander
a public office 3 where they are spoken in reference to a person s trade or profession see jones v jones 1916 2 ac 481 4 where they impute a contagious disease likely to cause exclusion from society
Occupancy
the possession so long as the cestui que vie lived by right of occupancy see re michell moore v moore 1892 2 ch 96 the title of common occupancy is now in effect abolished for it is enacted
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Libel
writing of fictitious character which incidentally contains the name of a real person may be a libel see jones v hulton co 1910 ac 20 where lord loreburn said p 23 libel is a tort which consists in
Actio personalis moritur cum persona.
s max twycross v grant 1877 4 cpd 40 phillips v homfray 1993 24 ch d 439 and jones v simes 1890 43 ch d 607 as to injunction this rule of the common law has been encroached
Pawnbroker
for three years at least special contracts by s 24 special contracts see sch iii form 7 and jones v marshall 1889 24 qbd 269 may be made with a loan above 40s extended by the english moneylenders
Gift
deed see irons v smallpiece 1819 2 b ald 551 approved by the court of appeal in cochrane v moore 1890 25 qbd 57 also the name given to the right of presentation to a church living which
Publication
morgan 1888 20 qbd 635 but publication can be made to either husband or wife respecting the other jones v williams 1888 1 tlr 572 the third party to whom the matter is published may be in the
Bill of Exchange
the endorsee or holder and so on ad infinitum a payee is not a holder in due course jones v waring 1926 ac 670 the earliest recorded bills of exchange according to beckmann hist invent iii 430 are
Compounding
be no prosecution of an offender the agreement is void as being founded on an illegal consideration see jones v merionethshire building society 1892 1 ch 173 penal actions by common informers may be compounded by leave of
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free