Skip to content

John V The - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Consent and implied consent

inaction would not be sufficient to amount to implied consent on the part of the landlord, conservation, P John Chandy and Co. (P.) Ltd. v. John P. Thomas, AIR 2002 SC 2057 (2062): (2002) 5 SCC 90.

Confer 'conferment'

Confer 'conferment', the expression 'confer' is pointer to something done overtly and explicitly, P. John Chandy & Co. (P) Ltd. v. John P. Thomas, (2002) 5 SCC 90.

Law

(1969) 2 SCC 43. An executive order cannot be regarded as existing law or 'law in force', K.O. John v. State, AIR 1956 Trav 117. It includes any Act of Parliament or of a State Legislature, Ordinances promulgated

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Proceeding

further progress of a case. The meaning of the word 'proceeding' is generally governed by the statute itself, John Mithalal Desai v. Dinesbhai, 1997 3 Guj LR 2103. Means something in which business is conducted according to

Regulation

Act. Rules cannot be made to supplant the provisions of the enabling Act but to supplement it, St. John Teachers Training Institute v. Regional Director, NCERT, AIR 2003 SC 1533 (1539): (2003) 3 SCC 321. Regulation, the

Extravagantes

the body of the canon law. The first extravagantes are those of Pope John XXII., successor of Clement V. The last collection was brought down to the year 1843, and was called the common extravagantes, notwithstand-ing that they

Award

1 SCC 673 (679). [Land Acquisition Act 1894, s. 23 (1A)] Award includes part of the award, K.K. John v. State of Goa, (2003) 8 SCC 193. [Arbitration Act, 1940, s. 16(3)] The expression 'award' is used in

Illegal contract

let for prostitution, Jennings v. Brown, (1842) 9 M&W 496; or for price of indecent picture, Fores v. Johnes. (1802) 4 Esp 97; or in prejudice to the administration of justice, Windhill Local Board v. Vint, (1890)

Material alteration

may otherwise prejudice the party bound by the deed as originally executed, Loonkaran Sethia v. Mr. Ivan E. John, AIR 1977 SC 336 (347): (1977) 1 SCC 379: (1977) 1 SCR 853. The material alterations contemplate change

Judicial

competent authority, upon consideration of facts and circumstances and imposing liability or affecting the rights of others, Regina John M'Evoy v. Dublin Corpn., (1878) 2 LR Ir 371. Has two meanings. It may refer to the discharge

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial