Jan Kumar V State - Law Dictionary Search Results
Trade
of maharashtra 1973 mah lj 420 trade includes every kind of trade business pro fession or occupation mahesh kumar v state of gujarat 1975 slwr 74 1974 15 guj lr 293 trade includes persons in a line of business
Trial
stage of the proceeding in a criminal case after the charge had been framed against the accused vijay kumar v state 1977 clr j k 37 41 1977 faj 526 trial is used in the sense of reference to … a judgment of acquittal or conviction of the prisoner it means the whole of proceedings including the sentence janardhan v state of kerala 1978 ker lt 546 means the examination and determination of a cause by a
Transfer
take up the duties of a new post or in consequences of a change of his headquarter arbind kumar v state of bihar 1996 2 pat ljr 406 transfer means to convey or remove from one place or one
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Rape
in the law the depth of penetration is immaterial in an offence punishable under s 376 ipc aman kumar v state of haryana 2004 4 scc 379 386 sakshi v union of india 2004 5 scc 518 penal code
Moral turpitude
societal parlance to describe conduct which is inherently base vile depraved or having any connection showing depravity pawan kumar v state of haryana air 1996 sc 3300 1996 4 scc 17 21 see also air 1959 all 71 one
Modesty
it is the reserve or sense of shame proceeding from instinctive aversion to impure or coarse suggestions aman kumar v state of haryana 2004 4 scc 379 389 indian penal code s 354 the essential ingredients of the offence
Instigate
of anger or emotion without intending the consequences to actually follow cannot be said to be instigation ramesh kumar v state of chattisgarh air 2001 sc 3837 3844 penal code 1860 ss 306 107 see also 2003 12 scc
Subordinate
art and in its dictionary meaning it connotes several ideas including holding of secondary or subservient position toesh kumar v state of bihar 1985 bljr 19 means a court can be said to be subordinate to another court only
Official duty
course of his service and that it should fall within scope of range of his official duty rakesh kumar v state of bihar 2006 1 scc 557
Attempt to commit crime
consummation completion koppula venkata rao v state of andhra pradesh 2004 3 scc 602 606 see also aman kumar v state of haryana 2004 4 scc 379 penal code 1860 s 511
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free