Jains - Law Dictionary Search Results
Resident in India
be avoided. The expression 'resident in India' is clearly used in the sense 'resident of India', Shanti Prasad Jain v. Director of Enforcement, AIR 1962 SC 1764 (1778): (1963) 2 SCR 297. [Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, (7
Relating to
the wide sweep of the words 'relating to recovery of possession' as employed by s. 41(1), Manusukhlal Dhanraj Jain v. Eknath Vithal Ogale, AIR 1995 SC 1102 (1105): (1995) 2 SCC 665. [Presidency Small Cause Courts Act
Public Order Act, 1936
to the public. It must be a place to which the public, in fact, resorts or frequents, Gaurav Jain v. Union of India, (1997) 8 SCC 114 (128): AIR 1997 SC 3021. Means any place intended for
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Public order
Commodities Act, may not be equated with the maintenance of public order as is commonly understood, Romesh Lal Jain v. Naginder Singh Rana, (2006) 1 SCC 294. Public order, has a comprehensive meaning so as to include
Privilege
also the following titles and DISTRESS; LIBEL. The word privilege is sufficiently wide to include an immunity, Mohanlal Jain v. His Highness Maharaja Shri Sawai Man Singh Ji, AIR 1962 SC 73 (75, 76): (1962) 1 SCJ
Property mark, trade mark
even if part of such property goes out of his hands and ceases to be his, Sumat Prasead Jain v. Sheojonaw Prasad, AIR 1972 SC 2488 (2490): (1973) 1 SCC 56. [Penal Code, s. 479; Trade and
Property mark
a device, brand, heading, label, ticket, name, signature, word, letter or numerical or any combination thereof, Sumat Prasad Jain v. Sheojanam Pradas & State of Bihar, AIR 1972 SC 2488: (1973) 1 SCC 56: (1973) 1 SCR
Pronounce judgment
for arriving at the conclusion that decree in terms of award be passed, Union of India v. Manager Jain & Associates, (2001) 3 SCC 277: AIR 2001 SC 809. [Civil PC, 1908, O. 20, R. 4(2)]
Profit
in business, profession of vocation when both the receipts and payments are taken into consideration, Rajkishen Prem Chandra Jain v. C.I.T., AIR 1959 Punj.
Rule of law
provisions of law, such a method will destroy the very basis of the rule of law, Muna Lal Jain v. State of Assam, AIR 1962 SC 386. Rule of law, is an absolute supremacy and predominance of
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free