Did you mean: jan kumar v state?
Jai Kumar V State - Law Dictionary Search Results
Possession
contexts of all statues. Supdt. & Remembrancer of Legal Affairs v. Anil Kumar Bhunja, AIR 1980 SC 52 (55). [Arms Act, 1959, s. 29(b)] Possession … the owner but the actual physical possession would surely be that of the agent, Seksaria Cotton Mills Ltd. v. State of Bombay, AIR 1953 SC 278: (1953) Cr LJ 1116. Possession, is not a purely legal concept but … in common parlance denoted to occupy, to have or hold as owner, to obtain, to maintain, Krishna Prasad Jaiswal v. Kanti Gupta, (1996) 1 BLJ 45. Possession, indicates possession with a power of disposal, Bhagchand v. Emperor,
Desertion
when authorized by the United States; is guilty of desertion Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C.A. 885. Virendra Kumar v. Chief of Army Staff, (1986) 2 SCC 217: AIR 1986 SC 1060. … desertion is not complete, but is inchoate, until the suit is constituted. Desertion is a continuing offence, Bipinchandra Jaisinghbhai Shah v. Prabhavati AIR 1957 SC 176: (1956) SCR 838: (1957) SCJ 144.' Desertion for the purpose of … cases. Desertion is not the withdrawal from a place but from a state of things, for what the law seeks to enforce is the recognition
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
Try the research workspace - 7 days free