Skip to content

Inacio Martins V Narayan - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Weaker section of society

Court directed that a 'means test' for identifying 'weaker ss. of the society' shall be adopted, Shantistar Builders v. Narayan Khimalal Totame, AIR 1990 SC 630 (635): (1990) 1 SCC 520. (Constitution of India, Arts. 46, 136) Weaker

Land

the sanad would not, therefore, necessarily indicate that it was a grant of the soil, State of Maharashtra v. Narayan Vyankatesh Deshpande, AIR 1976 SC 1204: (1976) 3 SCC 404: (1976) 3 SCR 980. The word 'land' in

Libel

to the discretion of the judge in awarding or withholding costs upon a verdict for nominal damages, see Martin v. Benson, (1927) 1 KB 771. But to be a defence to an indictment, a plea justifying on

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Lottery

Geo. 4, c. 60, they were abolished. As to what constitutes 'keeping' within the Act of 1802, see Martin v. Benjamin, (1907) 1 KB 64; but a body corporate cannot be convicted (s. 41) as rogues and

Discovery

filed by the opposite party, called a bill of discovery, which was an original bill. Sir James Wigram, V.C., in his work, entitled Points in the Law of Discovery, epitomized the two cardinal principles on this subject

Locomotives. I

fire caused by sparks from a locomotive, see (English) Railway Fires Act, 1905 (5 Edw. 7, c. 11), Martin v. G.E. Ry. Co., (1912) 2 KB 406. See, further, RAILWAY.

Bill of Exchange

though not as a process in use among English merchants. The earliest English case on the subject is Martin v. Boure, (1603-04) Cro. Jac. 6. (See the judgment of Lord Cockburn, C.J., in Goodwin v. Robarts, (1855)

Coparcenary

member of the joint family and his sons, grandsons and great grandsons constitute a coparcenary, State of Maharashtra v. Narayan Rao Sham Rao Deshmukh, (1985) 2 SCC 321: AIR 1985 SC 716: (1985) 3 SCR 358. 'Coparcenary' is

British museum

Act, 1902, and to lend objects for public exhibition by 14 & 15 Geo. 5, c. 23. In Martin v. British Museum Trustees, (1894) 10 TLR 338, the plaintiff failed to recover for a libel in a

Engine

Amendment Act, 1923, gives compensation for damage by fires caused by sparks or cinders from railway engines; see Martin v. G.E. Railway, (1912) 2 KB 406; A.-G. v. G.W. Railway, (1924) 2 KB 1. See TRACTION ENGINE

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial