Skip to content

In Ward V Smith - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Dearle v. Hall

date of notice to the trustees or other owners of the legal interest in the property assigned see ward v duncombe 1893 ac 369 the rule did not extend to equitable interests in land except to proceeds of

Under-lease

lessor can distrain on the sub lessee or take advantage of a condition of forfeiture g w ry v smith 1876 2 ch d 253 by s 4 of the conveyancing act 1892 replaced by the english law

Bungalow

enclosing that floor either with or without gables but the space under the roof may be utilised see ward v paterson 1929 2 ch 396 restrictive covenant bungalow is a building of which the walls with the exception

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Adverse possession

amounted to denial of his title to the property claimed t anjanappa v somalingappa 2006 7 scc 570 ward v carttar 1865 lr 1 eq 29 35 deav 171 55 er 860 rains v buxton 1880 14 ch

Bailment

for reward to be paid to the bailee for the history of the liability of carriers see nugent v smith 1876 1 cpd 423 and for an explanation of the duty of private bailees of this class brabant

Unconditionally

unconditionally means without conditions that is conditions well known to practitioners which might have been usually imposed smith v smith 139 145 lt 23

Priority

427 the notice does not under the rule in dearle v hall affect the validity of the assignment ward v duncombe 1893 ac 369 it merely establishes priority under the english law of property act 1925 s 137

Act of God

irresistible act of nature which could not by any reasonable care have been foreseen or resisted see nugent v smith 1876 1 cpd 423 the general rule is that where the law creates a duty and the party

Levy

levy and rate of levy levy of duty does not mean actual collection collector of central excise chandigarh v smith kline beecham consumer health care ltd air 2003 sc 829 see central excise act 1944 1 of 1944

Preventive detention

the director of public prosecutions r v waller 1910 1 kb 364 in certain cases be charged r v smith 1910 1 kb 17 with being an habitual criminal and if the charge is established he can in

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial