Skip to content

In Stone V White - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Rectification

ch d 46 in agreements concerning land olley v fisher 1886 34 ch d 367 in conveyances white v white 1872 lr 15 eq 247 and in leases cowan v truefitt ltd 1899 2 ch 309 as to

Consideration

side or mental incompetency on the other and inequity inadequacy maybe a reason for refusing specific performance pegler v white 33 beav 403 b forbearance for a time to institute a suit upon a well founded claim or

Weights and measures

1905 1 kb 410 but a paper bag for sugar was held not to be within s 26 in stone v tyler 1905 1 kb 290 an amending english weights and measures act 1889 provides of the verification of

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Children

the english offences against the person act 1861 as to which see reg v falkingham 1870 and reg v white 1871 lr 1 ccr 222 311 evidence the admissibility of the evidence of a child of tender years

Uses

by deed if such was the testator s intent see the judgment of jessel m r in baker v white 1875 lr 20 eq 166 the practical advantages of the system subsequently to the statute were conveyances to

Concealment

and as to contracts for the sale of land see flight v booth 1 bing nc 377 terry v white 32 cd 29 and prospectus

Murder

child destruction if satisfied that such offence has been committed as to punishment for attempted murder see r v white 1910 2 kb 124 a murderer is absolutely disqualified from deriving any benefit under the will of his

Consolidation of mortgages

by the decided cases for the general law see jennings v jordan 1881 6 app cas 698 pledge v white 1896 ac 187 fisher on mortgages consolidation must not be confounded with tacking which arose where successive mortgages

Retainer of debts

a judgment for administration re barrett 1889 43 ch d 70 nor by payment in to court richmond v white 1879 12 ch d 361 but it cannot be exercised by a bankrupt administrator wilson v wilson 1911

Mutual testaments

survivor cannot revoke his or her will if the benefit of the other will has been taken see stone v hoskins 1905 p 194 in estate of heys 1914 p 192

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial