In Smith V Johnson - Law Dictionary Search Results
Under-lease
the lessor can distrain on the sub-lessee or take advantage of a condition of forfeiture, G.W. Ry. v. Smith, (1876) 2 Ch D 253. By s. 4 of the Conveyancing Act, 1892, replaced by the (English) Law … or in deed, which exist between the original lessor and lessee [Holford v. Hatch (1779) 1 Dougl 183; Johnson v. Wild, (1890) 44 Ch D 146]; but the lessor can distrain on the sub-lessee or take advantage
Wager
wagering contract may be recovered if not, or before it has been, paid over, Burge v. Ashley and Smith, (1900) 1 QB 744; Hyams v. Stuart King, (1908) 2 KB 696. See, generally, the Betting and Lotteries … the courts were bound to enforce, so long as it was not against morality, decency, or sound policy, Johnson v. Lumley, (1852) 12 CB 468. But by the (English) Gaming Act, 1845, s. 18: All contracts or
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
Try the research workspace - 7 days free