Skip to content

Gopal V The - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Acquisition

and can only mean some other monetary payment in the nature of cash or deferred payment, Devi Das Gopal Krishnan v. State of Punjab AIR 1967 SC 1895 (1904): (1967) 3 SCR 557. Means the gaining of

Taking cognizable

warrant for the purpose of the investigation, he cannot be said to have taken cognizance of the offence, Gopal Das Sindhi v. State of Assam, AIR 1961 SC 986 (989): (1961) 2 Cri LJ 39. [Criminal PC,

Tamiliknama

are transferred and the document expressly says that the grantee has been made a 'Malik' or owner, Ram Gopal v. Nand Lal, AIR 1951 SC 139 (141): (1950) SCR 766.

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Forthwith

3 SCC 754. The word 'forthwith' has been interpreted to mean 'as soon as possible; without any delay', Gopal Mondal v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1975 SC 1807, MISA (26 of 1971), s. 3. When a

Soon before

much between the cruelty or harassment concerned and the death in question, State of Andhra Pradesh v. Raj Gopal Asawa, (2004) 4 SCC 470

With

nouns, in the sense 'and', 'as well', New Shorter Oxford Dictionary (1993). See also A.K. Raghumani Singh v. Gopal Chendra Nath, (2000) 4 SCC 30. The word 'with' in Article 304(b) of the Constitution of India, involves

Mouth freshener

freshener are within the meaning of 'food' under s. 2(v) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Krishna Gopal Sharma v. Government of NCT of Delhi, (1996) 4 SCC 513 (518). [Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1934

Permanent

India Museum, AIR 1930 Cal 404. Means lasting till the end of term of lease, S.N.M. Maharaj v. Gopal Das, (1968) ILR 2 All 327: (1969) All LJ 440.

Proved

possible doubt; but a fair doubt based upon reason and common sense, State of Uttar Pradesh v. Krishna Gopal, (1988) 4 SCC 302 (313): AIR 1988 SC 2154. (Evidence Act, 1872, s. 3)

Mallak

in the surrounding circumstances to indicate that such full proprietary rights are not intended to be conferred, Ram Gopal v. Nandlal, 1951 SC 139; Sakarlal Chootolal v. Mehta Chunilal Manilal, 1953 Sau 146 (DB).

  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial