Evans V Pike - Law Dictionary Search Results
Shop
the provisions of closing orders; see Second and Third Schedules. An incorporated company is bound by the Act, Evans v. L.C.C., (1914) 3 KB 315. The Act was mended, in its application to premises for the sale of
Hospitals
liable for negligent medical treatment by the staff employed, Hillyer v. St. Bartholomew's Hospital, (1909) 2 KB 820; Evans v. Liverpool Corporation, (1906) 1 KB 160. As to exemption from land tax, see s. 25 of the Land
Bread
of the offence of refusal to weigh in the case of bread carried out in a cart, See Evans v. Jones, (1909) 99 LT 799; Lyons & Co. v. Houghton, (1915) 1 KB 489. S. 8 of the
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Author
Publishing Co., (1897) 1 Ch 21. See Nisbet & Co. v. Golf Agency, (1907) 23 TLR 370, and Evans v. Hulton & Co., (1924) 121 LT 534. Means-(i) in relation to a literary or dramatic work, the author
Name
c. 92), s. 7. The addition of '& Co.' was held to be a change of name in Evan v. Piauneau, (1927) 2 KB 374. See BUSINESS NAMES; and (English) Registration of Business Names Act, 1916 (6
Seduction
debauching of the girl, per quod servitium amisit, but no express contract of service need be proved; see Evans v. Walton, (1867) LR 2 CP 615. There must be a legal right or interest by the plaintiff in
Together
Together, means at the time of implantation, 'not at any time' during the provision of treatment, Evans v. Amicus Healthcare Ltd. (Secretary of State for Health Intervening), (2005) Fam 1 (37), para 141. The word together
Half pike
Matched in: Term Half pike
Morris pike
Matched in: Term Morris pike
Dearle v. Hall
Dearle v. Hall. The rule which takes its name from this case, reported 1823, 3 Russ. 1, originated with the
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free