Skip to content

Emperor V Omkar - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Knowledge

existence of which has been communicated to him by persons whose veracity he has no reason to doubt emperor v zamin air 1932 oudh 28 knowledge be inferred from the circumstances of the case emperor v maturanath de

Offer to bribery

narrow construction in order to ensure that elections are held in an atmosphere of absolute purity ghasiram majhi v omkar singh air 1968 ori 99 103 representation of the people act 1951 s 123 1

Lottery

9 scc 700 746 a lottery is a scheme for the distribution of prizes by lot or chance emperor v gurbaksh singh air 1934 lah 840 lottery means a scheme in whatever form and by whatever name called

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions of sub-s. (1)

this expression is not intended to cut down the generality of the meaning of the preceding provision king emperor v sibnath banerji 1945 fcr 195 air 1945 pc 156 shiv kirpal singh v v v giri air 1970

Qui facit per alium facit per se

notice issued by the standing committee in accordance with the maxim qui facit per alium facit per se emperor v heptulla alibhai air 1930 bom 352 the maxim the law of agency is not a doctrine of criminal

Occupier of a factory

must court think have the right to occupy the property and dictate how it is to be managed emperor v jamshedji naserwanji modi air 1931 bom 308 the expression occupier is not to be equated with owner john

Precaution against fire

fire and the words would not in their literal interpretation cover pre cautions against the consequence of fire emperor v hussain ibrahim air 1943 bom 5 1943 ilr bom 92

Procession

or something spectacular so as to attract attention and organised implying a common intention or unity of purpose emperor v nana shahu 45 blr 303 air 1943 bom 209

Substance of evidence

of evidence implies a judicious selection of precis of that part of the evidence which was really material emperor v hansraj dindayal 49 cal lj 94

Under Colour of Office

office however unreasonable it might be and although itmight be done in mistaken exercise of duty or authority emperor v amimiya imammiya air 1948 bom 197 1947 49 bom lr 829

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial