Citing Lanzetta V New - Law Dictionary Search Results
Occupation
work, profession, job, principal activity, employment, business or a calling in which an individual is engaged, Sodan Singh v. New Delh Municipal Committee, (1989) 4 SCC 155. Is defined as 'an activity in which one engages' or a
Wilful
said that the word wilful suggests bad conduct or action though it does not necessarily connote blame, Wheeler v. New Merton Board Mills, (1933) 2 KB 669. Not infrequently the word has been used to mean that the
Publish
and issue to the public. (3) To communicate to a third person, Webster's Comprehensive Dictionary, International Edn.; C.C.E. v. New Tobacco Co., (1998) 8 SCC 250. Publish, means to make generally accessible or available; to place before or
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Penalty
of the offending party: the essence of liquidated damages is a genuine covenanted pre-estimate of loss, Dunlop Co. v. New Garage Co., 1915 AC 79; approved in Widnes Foundry (1925) Ltd. v. Cellulose Acetate Co. Ltd., (1931) 2
Rent
by the landlord in favour of the tenant, Banarsides v. Ram Krishna, AIR 1995 MP 147; H.S. Rikhy v. New Delhi Municipality, AIR 1962 SC 554. Rent, includes all that is payable as consideration for the tenancy. The
Terrorism
Terrorism, as ordinarily understood, means the act of terrorising, Muralidhar Sarangi v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., (2000) 3 SCC 466. It may be possible to describe 'terrorism' as use of
Evidence
to when evidence of collateral facts is admissible, see Hales v. Kerr, (1908) 2 KB 601; Butterley Co. v. New Hucknall Colliery Co., (1909) 1 Ch 37. As to acts showing a continuous course of conduct, see R.
Vest
It will depend on the context in which it is used in a particular piece of legislation, Dayawanti v. New Delhi Municipality, AIR 1982 Del 534. [See also Punjab Municipal Act, 1911, s. 193(2)]
Licence and lease
1 SCR 368. The occupier paying 'rent' may be a licensee and not a tenant, Dr. H.S. Rikhy v. New Delhi Municipal Committee, AIR 1962 SC 554.
Executor de son tort.
be brought against him, 1 Wms. Exors.; and see Peters v. Leeder, (1878) 47 LJ QB 573; A.-G. v. New York Breweries Co., 1899 AC 62. As to his liability in respect of a term of years of
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free