Chintamon Singh V Emperor - Law Dictionary Search Results
Malice
another in its legal sense it means a wrongful act done intentionally without just cause or excuse bhagat singh v emperor air 1930 lah 266 malice has been said to mean any wrong or indirect motive but a prosecution
Fracture
that the crack must extend from the outer surface of the skull to the inner surface in mutukdhar singh v emperor a 1942 pat 376 it was observed that if the evidence is merely that a none has been
Fractus augent h'reditatem
that the crack must extend from the outer surface of the skull to the inner surface in mutukdhar singh v emperor a 1942 pat 376 it was observed that if the evidence is merely that a none has been
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Same transaction
but a new one in spite of the fact that the same general purpose may continue shapurji sorabji v emperor air 1936 bom 154 debi prasad v emperor 212 ic 135 raj kishore tewari v rex air 1949
Precedent
in the conduct of their affairs as well as a basis for orderly development of legal rules surinder singh v hardial singh air 1985 sc 1985 1 scc 91 1985 1 scr 1059
Actus curiae neminem gravabit.
the court he should be restored to the position he would have occupied but for that mistake jang singh v brij lal 1964 2 scr 145 para 16 see also cit v b n bhattacharjee 1979 4 scc
Confession
not make a statement which would incriminate him unless urged by the promptings of truth and conscience sahib singh v state of haryana 1997 7 scc 231 air 1997 sc 3247 3254 terrorist and disruptive activities prevention act
May
pradesh v jogendra singh 1963 sc 1613 state of uttar pradesh v manbodan lal 1957 sc 912 kamar singh v delhi administration 1965 sc 971 banwari lal v state of bihar 1961 sc 849 narayana rao v state
Reason to believe
of the officer the belief must be held in good faith it cannot merely be a pretence partap singh v director of enforcement air 1985 sc 989 1985 3 scc 72 means that reasons should exist but the
Terrorism
hurt by the violence and those affected by the fear as well as in the practitioners devender pal singh v state nct of delhi air 2002 sc 1661 1665 2002 5 scc 234 terrorist and disruptive activities prevention
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free