Chatur V Emperor - Law Dictionary Search Results

Same transaction

but a new one in spite of the fact that the same general purpose may continue shapurji sorabji v emperor air 1936 bom 154 debi prasad v emperor 212 ic 135 raj kishore tewari v rex air 1949

Wholesale dealer

dealer is a person who keeps for wholesale to traders a commodity for the purpose of trade manoharbhai v emperor air 1946 nag 248 1945 ilr nag 422 1946 mad lj 319 means a person who buys or

of s 2 of the sale of goods act 1930 should include electricity gas and water ras behari v emperor air 1936 cal 753 country of durham electrical power distribution co v commissioners of inland revenue 1909 2

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Try free for 7 days See all features

Possession

prasad jaiswal v kanti gupta 1996 1 blj 45 possession indicates possession with a power of disposal bhagchand v emperor air 1934 bom 200 1934 36 bom lr 379 possession is a word that is incapable of an

Property

property capable of being forcibly destroyed and does not includes an easement of customary right see rudraraju ramaraju v emperor air 1930 mad 973 sumitra v dhannu air 1952 nag 193 property means the highest right a man

Malice

in its legal sense it means a wrongful act done intentionally without just cause or excuse bhagat singh v emperor air 1930 lah 266 malice has been said to mean any wrong or indirect motive but a prosecution

Salary or wages

the seller place the buyer or such person as he directs in possession of the property pyare lal v emperor air 1945 all 135 1945 ilr all 207 sale is found to consist of a number of ingredients

Letters-patent, or letters overt

act of parliament and it should be construed in the same way as an act benoari lal sarma v emperor air 1943 cal 285

Fracture

the crack must extend from the outer surface of the skull to the inner surface in mutukdhar singh v emperor a 1942 pat 376 it was observed that if the evidence is merely that a none has been

Fractus augent h'reditatem