Skip to content

Baker V Briggs - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Betting

paid could be recovered by the drawer from the payee, Dey v. Mayo, (1920) 2 KB 346; Sutters v. Briggs, (1922) 1 AC 1. The Gaming Act, 1922, does away with this position. The (English) Betting Act, 1853

Drunkenness

on a 'black list' (see below) without his consent [Donovan's case, (1903) 1 KB 895; and see R. v. Briggs, (1909) 1 KB 381, and HABITUAL DRUNKARD]. Black List.--The 'black list' above spoken of is the popular term

Habitual drunkard

by 15 & 16 Geo. 5, c. 51, s. 3); Eaton v. Best, (1909) 1 KB 632; R. v. Briggs, ibid. 381; and DRUNKENNESS.

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Dog

325. The owner may be liable though the bite was caused by the intervention of a third person, Baker v. Snell, (1908) 2 KB 825. Stray Dogs.--The (English) Dogs Act, 1906, em-powers police officers to seize any stray

Uses

they were limited by deed, if such was the testator's intent. See the judgment of Jessel, M.R., in Baker v. White, (1875) LR 20 Eq 166. The practical advantages of the system, subsequently to the statute, were: Conveyances

Death

at Common Law no civil claim for damages can be brought for the death of a human being, Baker v. Bolton, (1808) 1 Camp 493; The Amerika, 1914, P. 167. See BIRTHS, DEATHS AND MARRIAGES; ACTIO PERSONALIS; LAW

Waste

cases fortior est dispositio legis quam hominis, yet that shall not extend to encumber or spoil estates, see Baker v. Sebright, (1879) 13 Ch D 179; Garth v. Cotton, (1750) 1 Ves Sen 524 (546); 1 W&TLC. By

Signature

only [In the goods of Blewitt, (1880) 5 PD 116], or by mark only, though he can write, Baker v. Dening, (1838) 8 Ad&E 94. Signature is required to authenticate a will (see WILL), a deed after 1925

Third party

person may sometimes be liable for the tort even though by the intervention of a third party, see Baker v. Snell, (1908) 2 KB 825. Used in relation to a firm or to a partner therein means any

Marksman

1 Sw & Tr 22) or of a writing which the Statute of Frauds requires to be signed, Baker v. Dening, (1838) 8 A&E 94.

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial