Air 1994 Sc 72 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Public policy
uncertain. It has also been described as 'untrustworthy guide', 'unruly horse' etc., P. Rathinam v. Union of India, AIR 1994 SC 1844: AIR 1994 SCW 1764: (1964) 3 SCC 394: (1994) SCC (Cr) 740: (1994) 2 SCJ 545. Public … who at the time of making it was known to be married, Wilson v. Cranley, (1908) 1 KB 729. Public policy, however, said an eminent judge, 'is a very unruly horse, and when once you get astride
Wages
of 'wages' under s. 2(22) of the Act, Wellman (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. E.S.I.C., (1994) 1 SCC 219: AIR 1994 SC 1037 (1041). [Employees State Insurance Act, (34 of 1948), s. 2(22)] The term 'wages' includes the balance of
Trader
normal course of business, buys or sells any notified agricultural produce, State of Madhya Pradesh v. Hardeo Shrinath, AIR 1994 SC 2538: AIR 1994 SCW 358: (1994) 4 SCC 707: (1994) 4 JT SC 471: 1994 Jab LJ 526:
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Qualifying service
be taken into account for the purpose of pensions and gratuities admissible, Union of India v. S. Dharmalingam, AIR 1994 SC 592: (1994) 1 SCC 179: (1994) 1 SCJ 58: (1994) SCW 238: (1994) 1 Serv LJ (SC) 169:
Payable
which may, can or should be paid and is held equivalent to 'due', J.K. Synthetics Ltd. v. C.T.O., AIR 1994 SC 2393: (1994) 4 SCC 276. The word payable must mean that will become payable, Durga Prosad Khaitan v.
Refusal to act
do under law, State of West Bengal v. National Builder, (1994) 1 SCC 235: (1993) 3 SCJ 634: AIR 1994 SC 200: (1994) 1 UJ SC 81: (1993) 2 Bank CLR 563: (1993) 1 BLJR 205: (1993) 3 Cur
Fraud
gain by another's loss. It is a cheating intended to got an advantage, S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath, AIR 1994 SC 853 (855): (1994) 1 SCC 1. A term used in a variety of meanings. At Common Law, fraud
Subsidy
1990 183 ITR 591 (Guj); Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad v. P.J. Chemicals Ltd., AIR 1994 SCW 4352: AIR 1994 SC 2727: (1994) 6 JT SC 330: (1994) 110 ITR 830.
Gratuity
the duration and the quality of the service rendered by the employee, Bakshish Singh v. Darshan Engg. Works, AIR 1994 SC 251 (258): (1994) 1 SCC 9. (Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, s. 4
Decree
of the matters in controversy in the suit, Deep Chand v. Land Acquisition Officer, (1994) 4 SCC 99: AIR 1994 SC 1901. A decree in invitum is not an instrument securing money or other property; such a decree is … in the suit and may be either preliminary or final, Chandi Prasad v. Jagdish Prasad, (2004) 8 SCC 724 (729). [Civil Procedure Code, 1908, s. 2(2)] Is the final order of a court in a suit, it
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free