Air 1992 Sc 904 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Misconduct
the statute and the public purpose it seeks to serve, State of Punjab v. Ex. Constable Ram Singh, AIR 1992 SC 2188: (1992) 4 SCC 54: (1992) 3 SCR 634.The word 'misconduct' is antithesis of the word 'conduct'. Thus,
Processing
of material especially that in a raw state into marketable form, Saraswati Sugar Mills v. Haryana State Board, AIR 1992 SC 224: 1992 (1) SCC 418. Means running a cold storage for the preservation and refrigeration of goods amounts
Building
of s. 32 of the Act, CIT v. Gwalior Royan Sild Mfg. Co. Ltd, (1992) 3 SCC 326: AIR 1992 SC 1782 (1788). (Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 32) 'Building' means any work or construction done in any manner by
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Charitable purpose
the definition is narrower in scope, Municipal Corpn. of Delhi v. Children Book Trust, (1992) 3 SCC 390: AIR 1992 SC 1456: (1992) 2 SCR 535. To serve a charitable purpose it is not necessary that the object should
Education
or recreational activities as amounting to education, Haji Ismail Valid Mohmad v. Sports Club, (1992) 1 SCC 315: AIR 1992 SC 1855 (1857). [Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 1947 (57 of 1947), s. 6(1)]
Fraud
result in exercise of jurisdiction which otherwise would not have been exercised, Shrisht Dhawan (Smt.) v. Shaw Bros., AIR 1992 SC 1555: (1992) 1 SCC 534. Fraud is meant an intention to deceive, whether it is from any expectation
Vegetable
and vegetables are products of that industry, Saraswati Sugar Mills v. Haryana State Board, (1992) 1 SCC 418: AIR 1992 SC 224. The word 'vegetables' does not include Pan (betel leaves). Therefore betel leaves are taxable under the provisions
Judicial proceeding
within the meaning of ss. 193 and 228 of the Penal Code, K.T.M.S. Mohd. v. Union of India, AIR 1992 SC 1831: (1992) 3 SCC 178 (192). (FERA, 1973, s. 40) The proceedings before the Income-tax Officer are judicial
Sufficient cause
fide it would amount to vacating a building for sufficient cause, Surinder Singh Sibia v. Vijay Kumar Sood, AIR 1992 SC 1540 (1541): (1992) 1 SCC 70. [H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, s. 14(3), Proviso 2] The expression
Office of profit
person need not be in the service of the Government, Satrucharla Chandrasekhar Raju v. Vyricherla Pradeep Kumar Devi, AIR 1992 SC 1959: (1992) 4 SCC 404. The word 'office' does not, therefore, necessarily imply that it must have an
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free