Abdul All V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
Weapon
being used as 'weapons of offence' fall within the class of object which may be prohibited, Emperor v. Abdul Latif, AIR 1947 Bom 438: (1947) 49 Bom LR 340. Includes ammunition, bows and arrows, explosives, firearms, hooks,
Void
to be conveyed Acts which are void and Acts repealed are not the same; they are entirely different, Abdul Khadir v. State of Mysore, AIR 1951 Mys 72 (Mys): (1951) ILR Mys 284: 52 Cr LJ 922.
Record
1120. Means a memorial or remembrance. A file of papers connected with a suit or other, Specified Subject Abdul Rashid Khan v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 1961 All LJ 467. Means not only the impugned orders of
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Execution
out some act or course of conduct to its completion, (vide vol. 33'Corpus Juris Secundum), Haneef Joharan v. Abdul Salam, AIR 2001 SC 3404, (2001) 7 SCC 573. The act of carrying out or putting into effect,
Enforce
to give force or effect to; to compel obedience to (Black Law Dictionary) see also Hameed Joharan v. Abdul Salam, (2001) 7 SCC 573. In general, to cause to be executed or performed, to cause to take
Malik or milkiyat
'Malik' imports full proprietary rights unless there is something in the context to indicate the contrary, Mohendranarayan v. Abdul Gafur, 59 Cal 142. A bequest to a woman 'Malik' imports a full proprietary right unless there is
Voluntarily
not act, in performance of a legal duty, not due to coercion, or fraud, or misrepresentation, or mistake, Abdul Salam v. Union of India, AIR 1969 All 223.
Occasional or casual visit
plan of life, Shamnath Mushram v. Commissioner of Income-tax, AIR 1950 All 612. [Income Tax Act, s. 4A(a)(iii)]. Abdul Kader v. Income Tax Commissioner, AIR 1950 Mad 715
Makruh
Dictionary means odious, abominable, improper, unbecoming, loathsome, something to be detested, disliked or disapproved, Haji Mohd. Sayeed v. Abdul Ghafoor, AIR 1955 All 688 (690).
Not proved
between 'not proved' and 'false'. Merely not able to prove cannot be in all cases categorised as false, Abdul Rashid Khan v. P.A.K.A. Shahul Hamid, (2000) 10 SCC 636 (641). [Evidence Act, 1872, s. 3]
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free