5 3 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Caulk
See Calk v
Chevy
See Chivy v t
Chieve
See Cheve v i
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Building
of brick or stone covered by a roof, and said by Park, J., in R. v. Gregory, (1833) 5 B. & Ad. At p. 561, not to include a wall; but the definition depends on circumstances, and … Acts Amendment Act,1907 (c. 53) (now repealed); and see also Southend-on-Sea Corporation v. Archer, (1901) 70 LJ KB 328; South Shields Corporation v. Wilson, (1901) 84 LT 267. An old railway carriage will be a 'new building'
Company
Companies Acts, 1862 and subsequent Acts, now consolidated into the (English) Companies Act, 1925 (19 & 20 Geo. 5, c. 23). By s. 13 of the Act of 1925 (1) on the registration of the memorandum of … Acts which enabled persons to make use of them for dishonest purposes. The Act of 1929, by ss. 357 and 358, requires registration of every company, association or partnership of more than ten persons for banking and
Costs
the Statute of Gloucester (6 Edw. 1, c. 4), gave cots to a successful plaintiff, and 2 & 3 Hen. 8, c. 6, and 4 Jac. 1, c. 3, to a victorious defendant; see Garnett v. Bradley, … where the position is as between subject and subject. See R. v. Archbishop of Canterbury, (1902) 2 KB 571; Thomas v. Pritchard, (1903) 1 KB 212; Johnson v. King,1904 AC 824; Rwland v. Air Council, 1923 WN
Cause of action
to proof for obtaining to relief, Mayor (H.K.) Ltd. v. Owners and Parties Vessel N.B. Fortune Express, (2006) 3 SCC 100. Right to sue. All the facts which are necessary to establish the plaintiff's right to the … default or undue influence, Liverpool & London S.P. & I Assocn. v. M.V. Sea Success, (2004) 9 SCC 512 (562). [Civil Procedure Code, 1908, O. 7, R. 11(9)] --It is only that court in whose jurisdiction the
Insurance
an adjoining room, for the use of the public at large. The rooms are open from10 a.m. till 5 p.m.; but the most considerable part of the business is transacted between one and four. Merchants and ship-owners … the existence of the person or thing insured, and some prejudice from its destruction, Lucena v. Crauford (1806), 3 Bos & P 75; 2 Bos & PNR 269; a mere hope of profit is not insurable (ibid.).
Government
1953), ss. 16, 17, 26 and UP Sugarcane Supply and Purchase Order, 1954, cls. 3, 3A, 4 & 5 and Appendix, Forms A, B & C]; U.P. Cooperative Cane Unions Federations v. West U.P. Sugar Mills Association,
Negligence
collision between trains owned by the same company, Carpue v. London, Brighton, and South Coast Railway Co., (1844) 5 QB 747] Master and Servant.--A master is responsible to the public, and also, under certain conditions, to his … v. Collins, 1909 AC 640. This case should be distinguished from the principle in Fletcher v. Rylands, LR 3 HL 330 (Sm. L.C.), where the custodian of a dangerous thing (e.g., water stored by him, poisonous trees
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free