30 2 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Class II service
(Irrigation Branch) Rules,1964 must bear the same meaning as the expression 'Class II service' as defined in Rule 2 (5). The artificial definition of 'Class II service' introduced by amendment of Rule 2 (5) in 1975 was
Nor earlier than 30 days
Matched in: Term Nor earlier than 30 days
To which the provisions of Part II apply
the provisions of Part II apply, the words 'to which the provisions of Part II apply' in s. 28 of the Bombay Rent Act indicate that the exclusive jurisdiction for recovery of possession is to be exercised
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Notwithstanding, the words 'notwithstanding' in clause (1) and 'subject to' in clause (3) mean that where an entry is in general terms in List II and part of that entry is in specific terms in List I, the entry in List I takes effect notwithstanding the e
1958 in cases falling within the proviso, Sunder Dass v. Ram Parkash, AIR 1977 SC 1201 (1206): (1977) 2 SCC 662: (1977) 3 SCR 60.
Qui per fraudem agit, frustra agit (2 Rol. Rep 17)
Qui per fraudem agit, frustra agit (2 Rol. Rep 17), What a man does fraudulently, he does in vain.
Owner
control over the affairs of such under-taking. [Monopolies and restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (54 of 1969), s. 2 (ja)] Includes a Court of Wards in respect of property under the superintendence or charge of such Court.
Poaching
other person have by reservation the right to kill the game. [See (English) GAME ACT, 1831, ss. 2, 30] Unlawfully taking in the night, i.e., between the expiration of the first hour after sunset and the commencement
Misconduct
purpose of seek to serve, M.M. Malhotra v. Union of India, AIR 2006 SC 80. Misconduct under s. 30(a) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 has not a connotation of moral lapse. It comprises legal misconduct which is … occurs. It literally means wrong conduct or improper conduct, R.D. Saxena v. Balram Prasad Sharma, (2000) 7 SCC 264. Misconduct, means 'A transgression of some established and definite rule of action, a forbidden act, a dereliction from
Transubstantiation
called the 'Declaration against Transubstantiation') was required of all members of either House of Parliament in 1678, by 30 Car. 2, st. 2, c. 1, with the effect of disabling Roman Catholics from sitting in either House
Roman Catholics
effected by the requirement of the Declaration against Trans-ubstantiation (see TRANSUBSTANT- IATION) from members of either House by 30 Car. 2, s. 2, and disfranchisement by the requirements of the Oath of Supremacy by 7 & 8
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free