25 Iii - Law Dictionary Search Results
Article III court
Matched in: Term Article III court
Notwithstanding, the words 'notwithstanding' in clause (1) and 'subject to' in clause (3) mean that where an entry is in general terms in List II and part of that entry is in specific terms in List I, the entry in List I takes effect notwithstanding the e
not stand in the way of giving full effect to the retrospective introduction of the proviso in s. 3 and applying the provisions of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 in cases falling within the proviso, Sunder
Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-s. (3) (Essential Commodities Act, 1955)
Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-s. (3) (Essential Commodities Act, 1955), the amount payable to the person required to sell his stock of sugar would be with reference to the price fixed under the sub-section and not...
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Pr'munire
is the 'Statute of Pr'munire' generally so called, and incorporated by reference in many subsequent statutes; e.g., in 25 Hen. 8, c. 20, s. 6, whereby an archbishop or bishop refusing to confirm and consecrate a person … called the Statutes of Provisors, was passed in 1350, in the twenty-fifth year of the reign of Edward III., and was the foundation of all the subsequent statute of pr'munire, of which 16 Rich. 2, c. 5,
Treason
itself. Five species of treason are declared by the Treason Act, 1351, or 'Statute of Treasons' (25 Edw. 3, st. 5, c. 2), as follows:- (1) When a man doth compass or imagine the death of our
Piracy
natural allegiance; if by an alien, to be felony only; but since the Statute of Treason (25 Edw. 3, c. 2), it is held to be only felony in a subject. Formerly this offence was only cognizable … in the older writers which were used by the former author, Pike v. Nicholas, 1869 LR 5 Ch 251; as to pirating news from another newspaper, see Walter v. Steinkopff, (1892) 3 Ch 489. The remedies for
Provisor
person. Various statutes, called generally 'Statutes of Pro-visors,' were passed in ancient times to suppress such persons in 25 Hen. 8, c. 20, s. 7, the first and most important of them, 25 Edw. 3, st. 5, … persons in 25 Hen. 8, c. 20, s. 7, the first and most important of them, 25 Edw. 3, st. 5, c. 22, is called 'the Statute of the Provision and Pr'munire.' See PRAEMUNIRE.
Alnager, or Auinager
fixed seals to it, and also collected a subsidiary or aulnage duty on all cloths sold (25 Edw. 3, st. 4, c. 1).there were afterwards three officers belonging to the regulation of clothing, viz., searcher, measurer, and
Fixtures
Agricultural Holdings Act, 1875, s. 53, and the Landlord and Tenant Act, 1851 (14 & 15 Vict. c. 25), s. 3, contained very similar enactments, but the Act of 1851 applied only where the fixtures were put … that title), abrogating, as did the Acts of 1883 and 1908, the rule of Elwes v. Maw, (1802) 3 East 38; 2 Sm. L.C., gives a tenant a property in any engine, machinery, fencing, or building for
Hindu undivided family
is a separate entity by itself, ITO v. Ram Prasad, AIR 1974 SC 454 (457): (1973) 3 SCC 25. (Income-tax Act, 1922, s. 3) … 540) and Gowli Buddanna v. CIT. (supra). In the case of CIT v. Rm. Are. Veerappa Chettiar, ((1970) 3 SCR 307: (1970) 76 ITR 467: (1970) 1 SCC 174) the Supreme Court observed that under the Hindu
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free