Did you mean: 2022 9 sec 341?
2022 9 Scc 341 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Processing
etc., Regional Executive, Kerala Fishermen's Welfare Fund Board v. Fancy Food, 1995 (4) JT (SC) 15: (1995) 4 SCC 341. (See Maine Products Export Development Authority Act, 1972) Means a sequence of operations of changes under-gone. The term
Reasonable
v. Unique Erectors (Gujarat) Pvt. Ltd., (1989) 1 JT SC 157: (1989) 39 ELT 493: AIR 1989 SC 973; Rena Drego v. Lalchand Soni, (1998) 3 SCC 341. Reasonable, has in law the prima facie meaning of … JT SC 157: (1989) 39 ELT 493: AIR 1989 SC 973; Rena Drego v. Lalchand Soni, (1998) 3 SCC 341. Reasonable, has in law the prima facie meaning of reasonable in regard those circumstances of which the actor,
Cause of action
trust, wilful default or undue influence, Liverpool & London S.P. & I Assocn. v. M.V. Sea Success, (2004) 9 SCC 512 (562). [Civil Procedure Code, 1908, O. 7, R. 11(9)] --It is only that court in whose jurisdiction
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Family
the mother of the landholder is excluded from consideration, State of Gujarat v. Jat Laxmanji Talasji, (1988) 2 SCC 341: AIR 1988 SC 825 (828). [Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, (27 of 1961), s. 6 (3B)] Must always
Cadre
a service or a part of it as determined by the employer, State of Maharashtra v. Purshottam, (1996) 9 SCC 266 (269). Cadre, would ordinarily mean the strength of a service or a part of the service so
Preference
rule of reservation or rule of complete precedence, Andra Pradesh Public Service Commission v. Y.V.V.R. Srinivasulu, (2003) 5 SCC 341 (348): AIR 2003 SC 3961. The expression 'preference' means an equitable apportionment of vacancies reserved for backward classes,
Industry
industry nor are they workmen, MGT of Som Vihar Apt Owners Housing Maintenance Society Ltd. v. Workmen, (2002) 9 SCC 652: AIR 2002 SC 2530 (2531). [Industrial Disputes Act, (14 of 1947), s. 2(j)]
Minerals
be garnered and exploited for profit, V.P. Pithupitehai v. Special Secy. to the Government of Tamil Nadu, (2003) 9 SCC 634: AIR 2003 SC 2455. [Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act (67 of 1957), s. 3(a)]
Passing off
action lies, Goodfrey Phillips India Ltd. v. Girnar Food & Beverages Pvt. Ltd., 2000 PTC 365 SC: (1998) 9 SCC 531. Proof of a fraudulent intention is not a necessary element in a cause of action for passing
Public order
terrorism cannot be brought under the same by any stretch of imagination, Pucl v. Union of India, (2004) 9 SCC 580. (Constitution of India, Entry I, List II, Schedule VII) The expression 'public order' was inserted in Article
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free