Did you mean: 2008 14 sec 58?
2008 14 Scc 58 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Appointment
It means appointment both by promotion and by direct recruitment, Harkishan Singl v. State of Punjab, (1972) 1 SCC 58: AIR 1971 SC 1602 (1605): (1971) 2 SCC 58. [Punjab Civil Service (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules,
Statutory body
474: AIR 1976 SC 888: (1976) 2 SCWR 588: (1976) SLWR 67: 1976 SCC (Lab) 176: (1976) 2 SCC 58. Statutory body, the institution concerned must owe its very existence to a statute which would be the fountainhead … its powers, Vaish Degree College v. Lakshmi Narain, AIR 1976 SC 888 (893). [Agra University Hand-book (1965-66) Statute 14A]
Virulent
corresponding Sanskrit word for 'virulent', Swarajya Lakshmi v. Dr. G.G. Padma Rao, AIR 1974 SC 165: (1974) 1 SCC 58: (1974) 2 SCR 97. [Hindu Marriage Act (25 of 1955), s. 13(i) (iv)] Virulent, is not used by
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Order XIV
Order XIV. See LEAVE TO DEFEND.
carbon 14
Matched in: Term carbon 14
Habitually
2, p. 1204, Vijay Narain Singh v. State of Bihar, AIR 1984 SC 1334 (1338): (1984) 3 SCC 14: (1984) 3 SCR 435. Means 'usually' and 'generally', Mustakmiya Jabbar-miya Shaikh v. M.M. Mehta, Commissioner of Police, (1995)
Workman
Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Samishta Dube v. Cily Board, Etavaha, AIR 1999 SC 1056: AIR 3 SCC 14. [Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (28 of 1947), s. 2(z); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, s. 2(s)]
Goods
Madhya Pradesh v. Orient Paper Mills Ltd., AIR 1977 SC 687: (1977) 2 SCC 77: (1977) 2 SCR 149. The term 'goods' is defined in clause (7) of s. 2 of the Sale of Goods Act as … of India v. Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd., AIR 1973 SC 791: (1963) 1 Supp SCR 586. Goods includes all types of movable properties whether those propertices be tangible or intangible, Tata Constaltancy Services v.
I.O.U
they have the same sound. It ordinarily runs thus:- 'To Mr. A.B., I.O.U. twenty rupees. C.D January 1st, 2008.' If in the above form, it requires no stamp, being neither receipt, agreement, not promissory note. If it
Habitual criminal
should be continuity in commission of those offences, R. Kalavathi v. State of Tamil Nadu, (2006) 6 SCC 14: (2006) 6 JT 69: (2006) 6 SCALE 385: (2006) 5 Supreme 116: (2006) 5 SLT 321: (2006) 6 … 6 SCALE 385: (2006) 5 Supreme 116: (2006) 5 SLT 321: (2006) 6 SCJ 69: (2006) 7 SCJD 583: (2006) 8 SRJ 57: (2006) 3 SCC (Cri) 11: (2006) 3 Crimes 7 (SC): (2006) 2 JCC 1185:
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free