2002 1 Scc63330 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Desertion
spouse leaving the matrimonial home to form the necessary intention, Adhyatma Bhaltar Alwar v. Adhyatma Bhaltar Sri Devi, (2002) 1 SCC 308: AIR 2002 SC 88 (91). [Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, s. 13(1)(ib)] Desertion, implies an abandonment against the
Development
s. 55(a)]. Signifies permission which initially authorises the project, Reg. v. North Yorks C.C., Ex parte Brown [HL(E)], (2002) 1 LR 397 AC. … industries is one of the modes of developing an area, Gujarat Industrial Development Corpn. v. C.I.T., (1997) 7 SCC 17 (20): AIR 1997 SC 3275. The word 'development' in the BDA Act is defined as development with
Alibi
not, by any stretch of reasoning or logic, amount to pleading alibi, Subhash Chand v. State of Rajasthan, (2002) 1 SCC 702 (712). It is a convenient term used for the defence taken by an accused that when the … which are inconsistent with the fact in issue are relevant, see also Munshi Prasad v. State of Bihar, (2002) 1 SCC 351: AIR 2001 SC 3031. See also Janantibhai Bhenkarbhai v. State of Gujarat, (2002) 8 SC 165 (175).
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Landlord
a landlord need not be the owner, K.D. Dewan v. Harbhajan S. Parihar, AIR 2002 SC 67 (69): (2002) 1 SCC 119. [East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, (3 of 1949), ss. 2(c) and 13(3) (a)]
Assessee
made. [Equity Linked Savings Scheme, 2005, s. 2(b)] --includes deemed assessee. Income Tax Officer v. Delhi Development Authority (2002) 1 SCC 695: AIR 2002 SC 264 (267). [Income Tax Act (43 of 1961) s. 2 (7)] Means a person
According to law
reasonable person acting with objectivity could have reached on the material available. Chandrika Prasad v. Umesh Kumar Verma, (2002) 1 SCC 531 (534): AIR 2002 SC 108. According to law, judgment leading to a miscarriage of justice is not
Civic nature
among themselves, but with the state of which they are citizens, Expert Witness Institute v. Customs Comrs. (CA), (2002) 1 WLR 1674. Meant aims which were dignified as distinct from efficient, Expert Witness Institute v. Customs Comrs. (CA),
Good Cause
Good Cause, requires a lower degree of proof as compared to 'sufficient cause', Madanlal v. Shyamlal, (2002) 1 SCC 535; Arjun Singh v. Mohindra Kumar, AIR 1964 SC 993
Efficiency
relevant matters necessary for discharging his duties efficiently and satisfactorily, State of Uttar Pradesh v. Dr. K.V. Ansari, (2002) 1 SCC 616.
Directly attributable to
completion of disciplinary proceedings is directly attributable to the conduct of such workman, B.D. Shetty v. Ceat Ltd., (2002) 1 SCC 193.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free